A meta-synthesis of artificial reef studies in Türkiye

Yalçın Kaya; Altan Lök

doi:10.12714/egejfas.43.1.06

TR EN

Türkiye’deki yapay resif çalışmaları üzerine bir meta-sentez

Öz

Bu makale, 1990 ile 2025 yılları arasında Türkiye’deki 43 yapay resif (YR) çalışmasını (49 resif alanı) meta-sentezi yoluyla sistematik olarak incelemektedir. Veriler kodlandıktan sonra betimsel istatistikler kullanılarak tematik analiz yapılmış ve bir YR performans puanlama sistemi kullanılarak YR alanları değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, YR projelerinin Ege Denizi’nde yoğunlaştığını, burada genellikle koruma ve araştırma amaçlı beton kübik modüllerin orta derinliklere yerleştirildiğini göstermektedir. Ekolojik bulgular, YR’lerin Chromis chromis ve Diplodus vulgaris gibi türleri çektiğini doğrulamakla birlikte, tür zenginliği ve birey sayısındaki artışların yalnızca yaklaşık %36-38 olduğu rapor edilmiştir. Metodolojik olarak görsel sayım/gözlem baskın yöntem iken, uzun vadeli izleme ve sosyo-ekonomik değerlendirmeler sınırlı kalmıştır. YR performans puanı ortalama 4.07±1.02 olarak hesaplanmış olup, bu sonuç YR çalışmalarının orta düzeyde başarılı olduğunu göstermektedir. YR alanlarına ilişkin incelenen çalışmaların başlıca eksiklikleri arasında proje maliyet raporlamasının olmaması, merkezi koordinasyon eksikliği, kısa izleme süreleri ve yetersiz sosyo-ekonomik değerlendirme yer almaktadır. Çalışma, Türkiye’de YR’lerin tam potansiyeline ulaşabilmesi için bütünleşik planlama, standart izleme, paydaş katılımı ve çok işlevli proje tasarımları gerektiği sonucuna varmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

A meta-synthesis of artificial reef studies in Türkiye

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews artificial reef (AR) studies in Türkiye through a meta-synthesis of 43 studies (49 ARs) between 1990 and 2025. Data were coded and thematically analyzed using descriptive statistics and an AR performance scoring system was used to assess AR sites. The results show a strong concentration of AR projects in the Aegean Sea, where concrete cubic modules are typically deployed at mid-depths for protection and research. Ecological findings confirm ARs attract species like Chromis chromis and Diplodus vulgaris, but increases in species richness and abundance were reported in only about 36-38% of AR sites. Methodologically, visual census/observation predominated while long-term monitoring and socio-economic assessments were limited. An AR performance score averaged 4.07±1.02, indicating moderate success of AR studies. Key deficiencies include a lack of cost reporting, centralized coordination, short monitoring durations, and insufficient socio-economic evaluation. The study concludes that realizing the full potential of ARs in Türkiye requires integrated planning, standardized monitoring, stakeholder involvement, and multifunctional project designs.

Keywords

Etik Beyan

No specific ethical approval was necessary for the study. We have not used AI-assisted technologies in creating this article.

Teşekkür

This study did not receive any financial support, grant or assistance from any public, commercial or nonprofit funding organization. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their contribution during the manuscript review process.

Kaynakça

Acarlı, D., & Ayaz, A. (2015). Using concrete artificial reef as a tool to enrich the new marine habitat in Erdek–Ocaklar Bay (Marmara Sea, Turkey). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 24(2a), 602-611.
Acarlı, D., & Kale, S. (2020a). Species composition of artificial reef models specifically designed for Homarus gammarus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae) in the Sea of Marmara. Research in Marine Sciences, 5(1), 625-635.
Acarlı, D., & Kale, S. (2020b). Species-specific artificial reef models for lobster (Homarus gammarus Linnaeus, 1758). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.1.01
Acarlı, D., Kale, S., & Kocabaş, S. (2020). Biodiversity of TCSG-132 shipwreck artificial reef (Gökçeada, North Aegean Sea) (in Turkish). TCSG-132 shipwreck artificial reef (Gökçeada, North Aegean Sea): Biodiversity. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 16(3), 313 329. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.677175
Altaş, S. (2019). Determination of artificial habitat areas in the Ordu region and preliminary study (Master’s thesis, Ordu University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Baine, M. (2001). Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance. Ocean & Coastal Management, 44(3-4), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00048-5
Bohnsack, J. A. (1989). Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioral preference? Bulletin of Marine Science, 44(2), 631-645.
Bohnsack, J.A., & Sutherland, D.L. (1985). Artificial reef research: A review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science, 37(1), 11-39.

Bortone, S.A. (2006). A perspective of artificial reef research: The past, present, and future. Bulletin of Marine Science, 78(1), 1-8.
Bortone, S.A. (2011a). Introduction to the role artificial reefs play in fisheries management. In S. A. Bortone, F. P. Brandini, G. Fabi, & S. Otake (Eds.), Artificial Reefs in Fishery Management (pp. 1-7). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10910-2
Bortone, S.A. (2011b). A pathway to resolving an old dilemma: Lack of artificial reefs in fisheries management. In S. A. Bortone, F. P. Brandini, G. Fabi, & S. Otake (Eds.), Artificial Reefs in Fishery Management (pp. 311-321). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10910
Bracho-Villavicencio, C., Matthews-Cascon, H., & Rossi, S. (2023). Artificial reefs around the world: A review of the state of the art and a meta-analysis of its effectiveness for the restoration of marine ecosystems. Environments, 10(7), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10070121
Cardenas-Rojas, D., Mendoza, E., Escudero, M., & Verduzco-Zapata, M. (2021). Assessment of the performance of an artificial reef made of modular elements through small scale experiments. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020130
Cerim, H. (2011). A research on the observation of artificial reefs and diver profile at Bodrum Karaada (Master’s thesis, Muğla University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Chong, L., Siders, Z.A., Lorenzen, K., Ahrens, R.N., & Camp, E.V. (2024). Global synthesis of effects and feedbacks from artificial reefs on socioecological systems in recreational fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 25(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12809
Çakaloz, A.B. (2007). Determination of fish compositions at artificial reef sets deployed in different depths (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Dayı, S. (2001). A study on catch efficiency informations of use possibilities to determine the effectiveness of artificial reefs (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Demirhan, S.A., Alkan, A., & Şimşek, E. (2020). Artificial reef application from the Iskenderun Bay, Northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey: An experimental study. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 24(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.527933
Denis, J., Henocque, Y., & Antona, M. (2001). Des outils et des hommes pour une gestion intégrée des zones côtières: Guide méthodologique (Vol. II). UNESCO-COI.
Duman, Ü. (2009). Tag trials for some fish species on artificial reefs (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Duman, Ü. (2017). Determination of species variety of shellfishes in artificial reefs applied in Turkey coasts (Doctoral dissertation, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Erdem, E. (2006). A study on the efficiency of artificial reefs deployed internal part of Sinop Port (Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Fabi, G., Scarcella, G., Spagnolo, A., Bortone, S. A., Charbonnel, E., Goutayer, J.J., Haddad, N., Lök, A., & Trommelen, M. (2015). Practical guidelines for the use of artificial reefs in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea (No. 96). General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean Studies and Reviews, FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2020). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. FAO.
Gül, B. (2001). A study on seasonal variations of fish composition at artificial reefs (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Gül, B. (2008). A study on fish community structure of Ürkmez and Gümüldür artificial reefs (Doctoral dissertation, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Gül, B. (2023). Istanbul Artificial Reef Project and mucilage disaster. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 8(4/S), 795-802. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1265122
Gül, B., & Ünsal, T. (2024). Pre-study of the evaluation of ecological sessile succession and their relationship with bacteria on concrete artificial reef material. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 11(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1435748
Gül, B., Lök, A., Ulaş, A., & Düzbastılar, F.O. (2006). Fish assemblages at artificial reefs deployed on different substrates off Ürkmez coast (Aegean Sea) (in Turkish). Ege University Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 23(Suppl. 1/3), 431-434.
Hamal, S.N.G. (2025). Underwater photogrammetry supported by image enhancement for the analysis of temporal changes and environmental factors in artificial reefs (Doctoral dissertation, Mersin University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Kemer, A.Y. (2022). Monitoring of the artificial reef area fish diversity in Kuşadasi Gulf Pamucak (Master’s thesis, Aydın Adnan Menderes University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Kocabaş, S., & Acarlı, D. (2019). First observation of loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758) around the shipwreck used as an artificial reef in the coasts of Gökçeada Island, North Aegean Sea. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 8(2), 36 39. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.581725
Köken, S. (2017). A study on preferrıng artificial nest where deployed in different bottom structure of octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797) (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Lackey, R.T. (2005). Fisheries: History, science, and management. In J. H. Lehr & J. Keeley (Eds.), Water Encyclopedia: Surface and Agricultural Water (pp. 121 129). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/047147844X.sw249
Lima, J.S., Atalah, J., Sanchez-Jerez, P., & Zalmon, I.R. (2020). Evaluating the performance and management of artificial reefs using artificial reef multimetric index (ARMI). Ocean & Coastal Management, 198, 105350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105350
Lök, A. (1995). A study on the applicability of artificial reefs (Doctoral dissertation, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Lök, A., & Gül, B. (2005). Evaluation of fish fauna associated with experimental artificial reefs at Hekim Island, Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey) (in Turkish). Ege University Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 22(1-2), 109-114.
Lök, A., Gül, B., Ulaş, A., Düzbastılar, F.O., & Metin, C. (2008). Diel variations on the fish assemblages at artificial reefs in two different environments of the Aegean Sea (Western Coast of Turkey). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 8, 79-85.
Lök, A., Özgül, A., & Ünal, V. (2022). Impact of artificial reefs on the environment and communities. In J. H. Ramos (Ed.), Impact of artificial reefs on the environment and communities (pp. 110-125). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2344-8.ch006
McClanahan, T., Allison, E.H., & Cinner, J.E. (2015). Managing fisheries for human and food security. Fish and Fisheries, 16(1), 78-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12045
Özalp, H.B. (2009). Examination of the fish species attracted by the materials of ceramic, iron, tyre, wood and fiberglass being placed to the marine station of Çanakkale Sualtı and Cankurtarma Sport Club, Dardanelles (Master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Özgül, A. (2016). Use of the acoustic positioning system in artificial reef sites (in Turkish). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 33(4), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2016.33.4.15
Özgül, A., Lök, A., Tanrıkul, T.T., & Alós, J. (2019). Home range and residency of Scorpaena porcus and Scorpaena scrofa in artificial reefs revealed by fine-scale acoustic tracking. Fisheries Research, 210, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.008
Paxton, A.B., Shertzer, K.W., Bacheler, N.M., Kellison, G.T., Riley, K.L., & Taylor, J.C. (2020). Meta-analysis reveals artificial reefs can be effective tools for fish community enhancement but are not one-size-fits-all. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00282
Pelister, C. (2014). Small scale fishing gear used to fishing composition in Altınoluk artificial reef area (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Pickering, H., & Whitmarsh, D. (1997). Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research, 31(1-2), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(97)00019-2
Sahrhage, D., & Lundbeck, J. (2012). A history of fishing. Springer Science & Business Media.
Savut, M. (2013). Planning and implementation of artificial reefs in the case of the Altınoluk pilot project (Master’s thesis, Ordu University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Seaman, W. (2000). Artificial Reef Evaluation: With Application to Natural Marine Habitats. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420036633
Seaman, W., Jr., & Sprague, L.M. (1991). Artificial habitat practices in aquatic systems. In Artificial Habitats for Marine and Freshwater Fisheries (pp. 1-29). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-02647-6
Şensurat-Genç, T. (2022). Artificial wreck reefs: A preliminary assessment of their economic benefits to the coastal economy on a district level. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 26, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-022-00885-0
Şensurat-Genç, T., Karadal, O., Oruç, A.Ç., Özgül, A., & Lök, A. (2021). Effects of seasonal changes and depth on growth parameters of the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) on a shipwreck in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 50(4), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.2478/oandhs-2021-0038
Şensurat-Genç, T., Lök, A., Özgül, A., & Oruç, A.Ç. (2022a). No effect of nearby natural reef existence on fish assemblages at shipwrecks in the Aegean Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 102(6), 613 626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315422001011
Şensurat-Genç, T., Shashar, N., Ozsüer, M., & Özgül, A. (2022b). Shipwrecks are not the ultimate attracting features in a natural marine environment: The case of Karaburun, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 315, 115159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115159
Söylemez, C.S. (2003). An investigation of the possibilities of creating artificial lobster (Homarus gammarus L, 1758) reefs around Gökçeada (Master’s thesis, Istanbul University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Spagnolo, A., & Ferrà, C. (2025). Italy’s contribution to artificial reef research: A comprehensive review (1970-2025). Water, 17(22), 3250. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223250
Steimle, F.W., & Meier, M.H. (1997). What information do artificial reef managers really want from fishery science? Fisheries, 22(4), 6-8.
Tunca, S. (2011). Assessing the socio-economic effects of artificial reef deployments in the Northern Aegean Sea: The Altınoluk case (Master’s thesis, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Tunca, S., Lizaso, J.L.S., & Ünal, V. (2022). A stakeholder analysis of the artificial reefs in Edremit Bay, Türkiye: Social, economics, and management aspects. In J. H. Ramos (Ed.), Impact of Artificial Reefs on the Environment and Communities (pp. 48-68). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2344-8.ch003
Tunca, S., Miran, B., & Ünal, V. (2013). Benefits of artificial reefs in Altınoluk (Northern Aegean), Turkey: Assessment of potential users’ opinions via fuzzy pair-wise comparison approach. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 30(3), 99 104. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2013.30.3.02
Tunca, S., Miran, B., & Ünal, V. (2014). Perception and demand for artificial reef by relevant local groups in Altınoluk (Turkey). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 31(1), 5 10. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2014.31.1.02
Tunca, S., Miran, B., & Ünal, V. (2016). Non-market economic value of artificial reefs in Edremit Bay (Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 33(2), 97 107. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2016.33.2.02
Ulaş, A. (2000). A studies on natural and artificial habitats of octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797) populations in middle of İzmir bay (Doctoral dissertation, Ege University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)
Ulaş, A., Düzbastılar, F.O., Lök, A., & Metin, C. (2007). A preliminary study on the efficiency of fish sampling methods in artificial reefs (in Turkish). Ege University Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 24(3-4), 287-293.
Ulaş, A., Serdar, S., Yıldırım, Ş., & Göktürk, D. (2023). A study on the determination of fish species diversity in Pamucak artificial reefs in Kuşadası Bay, Aegean Sea (in Turkish). MAS Journal of Applied Sciences in Fisheries, 8(Special Issue), 1032 1048. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10026221
Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J.K., Branch, T.A., Collie, J.S., Costello, C., Fogarty, M.J., Fulton, E.A., Hutchings, J.A., Jennings, S., Jensen, O.P., Lotze, H., Mace, P.M., McClanahan, T.R., Minto, C., Palumbi, S.R., Parma, A.M., Ricard, D., Rosenberg, A.A., Watson, R., & Zeller, D. (2009). Rebuilding global fisheries. Science, 325(5940), 578 585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173146
Yılmaz, D., & Sarıgöl, B. (2018). Investigation of enrichment possibilities of natural stocks of European squid (Loligo vulgaris) by creating artificial habitats (in Turkish). Bilim Armonisi, 1(1), 65-71. Zengin, K. (2024). The Edremit Bay: Examination from natural reefs to artificial reefs in a 5 time series (Doctoral dissertation, Balıkesir University). YÖK National Thesis Center. (in Turkish)

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Su Ürünleri Teknolojileri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yalçın Kaya ^*
0009-0009-7824-931X
Türkiye

Altan Lök
0000-0003-0751-0620
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Şubat 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Aralık 2025

Kabul Tarihi

6 Ocak 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.43.1.06

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA53XN83MY

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kaya, Y., & Lök, A. (2026). A meta-synthesis of artificial reef studies in Türkiye. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.43.1.06