Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yumurtalı Penaeid Karides (Marsupenaeus japonicus Bate, 1888 ve Penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844) Anaçlarının İki Farklı Yöntem ile Canlı Nakli

Year 2007, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 109 - 112, 01.03.2007

Gürel Türkmen Osman Özden Hülya Saygı

Abstract

Penaeid karides anaçlarının doğru ve uygun nakli, stresten uzak kaliteli anaç temini ve sağlıklı kuluçkahane postlarva üretiminde önemli bir faktördür. Bu çalışmada, yumurtalı Marsupenaeus japonicus ve Penaeus semisulcatus anaçlarının açık tanklarda 20 anaç/100 lt yoğunluğunda ve çift polietilen torbalarda strafor kutular (40x50x30 cm) içinde üç farklı (3, 4 ve 5 anaç/5 lt) stok yoğunluğunda 12 saatlik canlı nakilleri araştırılmıştır. Kuluçkahaneye alındıktan sonra, açık tank naklinde yaşama ve yumurtalarını absorbe edenlerin oranı M. japonicus için %90 ve %17 olurken bu oranlar P. semisulcatus için %75 ve %40 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Polietilen torbalarla yapılan nakilde her iki türde de stok yoğunluğu arttıkça çözünmüş oksijen konsantrasyonu ve pH düşmüştür. 3 ve 4 anaç/5 lt stok yoğunluklarında yaşama oranın %100 olarak kaydedilmesine ve yumurtalarını absorbe edenlerin oranlarının 5 anaç/5 lt stok yoğunluğundakilerden düşük olmasına rağmen tür içi ve türler arası yoğunluklarda yeterli (P < 0.05) fark bulunmamıştır

Keywords

Canlı nakil yumurtalı anaç Marsupenaeus japonicus Penaeus semisulcatus

References

  • Anonim, 2005. Better Management Practices (BMP) Manual for Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) Hatcheries in Vietnam. NACA, 59s.
  • Babu, M.M., and M.P. Marian. 1998. Live transport of gravid Penaeus indicus using coconut mesocarp dust. Aquaculture Engineering, 18: 149-155.
  • James A., J. Wyban, N. Sweeney. 1991. Production of postlarvae: preparing shrimp for shipping. The Oceanic Institute Shimp Manual, USA, p.67.
  • Johnson, S.K., C.E. Cichra, G.W. Chamberlian. 1984. Wet transport of mature marine shrimp in sealed containers. Texas A&M University Extension Fish Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Publication FDDL-S14. Texas A&M University, Colege Station. Texas, USA.
  • Kocatas, A., T. Katagan, O. Ucal, H.A. Benli. 1991. Turkish Shrimp and Shrimp Aquaculture (in Turkish). T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köyisleri Bakanlıgı, Su Urunleri Arastırma Enstitusu Mudurlugu, Bodrum. Yayın No. 4, 143s.
  • Kumlu, M., M. Aktas, O.T. Eroldogan. 2003. Pond Culture of Penaeus semisulcatus (De Haan, 1844) in Sub-tropical Conditions of Turkiye. Ege University Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 20(3–4): 367–372.
  • Lumare, F. 1998. Crostacei Peneidi Tecnica E Gestione Dell’Allevamento. Manual Di Divulgazione Serie Acquacoltura, 4. ESAV, Roma.187p.
  • Primavera, J.H. 1989. Broodstock of Sugpo (Penaeus monodon Fabricius). Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 7, SEAFDEC, Phillippines. 26p.
  • Quinitio, E.T., P.G. Gabasa, F.P. Sunaz, E.P. Reyes, D.I.D. Pena. 1989. Prawn Hatchery Design and Operation. Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 9, SEAFDEC, Phillippines. 32p.
  • Rao, L.H., M. Kathirvel, P. Ravichandran, S. Sivagnanam. 1995. Development of Broodstock and Maturation of Tiger Prawn Penaeus monodon in Captivity. CIBA Bulletin No. 6, Madras, India. 10p.
  • Robertson, L., W.A. Bray, A.L. Lawrence. 1987. Shipping of Penaeid Broodstock: Water Quality Limitations and Control During 24 Hour Shipments. Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, 18(2): 45-56.
  • Samet, M., and K. Nakamura. 1997. Relative Humidity Effects on Tolerance of the Kuruma Prawn Exposed to 14 °C Air. Fisheries Science, 63(2): 194–198.
  • Shigueno, K. 1992. Shrimp culture industry in Japan. In: Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices (eds. A.W. Fast & J.L. Lester) pp. 641- 652. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
  • Sumbuloglu K. ve K. Sumbuloglu. 2000. Biostatistics (in Turkish), 9. Baskı. Hatiboglu Yayınları, Ankara, 269.
  • Turkmen, G. 2001. Still potential for Turkish shrimp. Fish Farming International, June, 41-42.
  • Turkmen, G. 2005a. The First Test Shrimp Culture Results from Izmir-Turkey. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development. Tropentag 2005, Stutgart-Hohenheim, October 11-13, 2005. 4 p.
  • Turkmen G. 2005b. The Research on Shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus and Penaeus japonicus) Culture under Different Methods at SUFA Lagoon of Fisheries Faculty of Ege University (in Turkish). E.U. Research Project, Final Report, Project No: 02-BIL-13, Bornova-İzmir, 38p.
  • Ueda, R., H. Sugita, Y. Deguchi. 1999. Effect of transportation on the serum bactericidal activity of Penaeus japonicus and Ovalipes punctatus. Aquaculture, 171: 221-225.
  • Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analsis, 3nd ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey, 662p.

Live transport of gravid penaeid shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus Bate, 1888 and Penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844) broodstock with two different methods.

Year 2007, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 109 - 112, 01.03.2007

Gürel Türkmen Osman Özden Hülya Saygı

Abstract

 Correct and consistent transportation of Penaeid shrimp broodstock is an important factor to supply stress-free quality broodstock and for healthy hatchery postlarvae output. In this study, live transport of gravid Marsupenaeus japonicus and Penaeus semisulcatus broodstock were tested in open tank at a density of 20 broodstock/100 L and at three different stocking densities (3, 4, and 5 broodstock 5 L-1) in double polyethylene bags held in styrofoam boxes (40x50x30 cm) within 12 hours. After transportation in open tank system, the rate of survival and absorption of eggs for M. japonicus were 90% and 17%, while these figures for P. semisulcatus were 75% and 40%. As the stocking density increased, the dissolved oxygen concentration and pH decreased in both species in polyethylene bags transportation. Although survival rate was recorded as 100% and absorption of eggs rate was lower at densities 3 and 4 broodstock 5 L-1 in comparison with that of 5 broodstock 5 L-1. There was no significant (P < 0.05) difference between each density and two species.

Keywords

Live transport gravid broodstock Marsupenaeus japonicus Penaeus semisulcatus

References

  • Anonim, 2005. Better Management Practices (BMP) Manual for Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) Hatcheries in Vietnam. NACA, 59s.
  • Babu, M.M., and M.P. Marian. 1998. Live transport of gravid Penaeus indicus using coconut mesocarp dust. Aquaculture Engineering, 18: 149-155.
  • James A., J. Wyban, N. Sweeney. 1991. Production of postlarvae: preparing shrimp for shipping. The Oceanic Institute Shimp Manual, USA, p.67.
  • Johnson, S.K., C.E. Cichra, G.W. Chamberlian. 1984. Wet transport of mature marine shrimp in sealed containers. Texas A&M University Extension Fish Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Publication FDDL-S14. Texas A&M University, Colege Station. Texas, USA.
  • Kocatas, A., T. Katagan, O. Ucal, H.A. Benli. 1991. Turkish Shrimp and Shrimp Aquaculture (in Turkish). T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köyisleri Bakanlıgı, Su Urunleri Arastırma Enstitusu Mudurlugu, Bodrum. Yayın No. 4, 143s.
  • Kumlu, M., M. Aktas, O.T. Eroldogan. 2003. Pond Culture of Penaeus semisulcatus (De Haan, 1844) in Sub-tropical Conditions of Turkiye. Ege University Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 20(3–4): 367–372.
  • Lumare, F. 1998. Crostacei Peneidi Tecnica E Gestione Dell’Allevamento. Manual Di Divulgazione Serie Acquacoltura, 4. ESAV, Roma.187p.
  • Primavera, J.H. 1989. Broodstock of Sugpo (Penaeus monodon Fabricius). Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 7, SEAFDEC, Phillippines. 26p.
  • Quinitio, E.T., P.G. Gabasa, F.P. Sunaz, E.P. Reyes, D.I.D. Pena. 1989. Prawn Hatchery Design and Operation. Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 9, SEAFDEC, Phillippines. 32p.
  • Rao, L.H., M. Kathirvel, P. Ravichandran, S. Sivagnanam. 1995. Development of Broodstock and Maturation of Tiger Prawn Penaeus monodon in Captivity. CIBA Bulletin No. 6, Madras, India. 10p.
  • Robertson, L., W.A. Bray, A.L. Lawrence. 1987. Shipping of Penaeid Broodstock: Water Quality Limitations and Control During 24 Hour Shipments. Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, 18(2): 45-56.
  • Samet, M., and K. Nakamura. 1997. Relative Humidity Effects on Tolerance of the Kuruma Prawn Exposed to 14 °C Air. Fisheries Science, 63(2): 194–198.
  • Shigueno, K. 1992. Shrimp culture industry in Japan. In: Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices (eds. A.W. Fast & J.L. Lester) pp. 641- 652. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
  • Sumbuloglu K. ve K. Sumbuloglu. 2000. Biostatistics (in Turkish), 9. Baskı. Hatiboglu Yayınları, Ankara, 269.
  • Turkmen, G. 2001. Still potential for Turkish shrimp. Fish Farming International, June, 41-42.
  • Turkmen, G. 2005a. The First Test Shrimp Culture Results from Izmir-Turkey. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development. Tropentag 2005, Stutgart-Hohenheim, October 11-13, 2005. 4 p.
  • Turkmen G. 2005b. The Research on Shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus and Penaeus japonicus) Culture under Different Methods at SUFA Lagoon of Fisheries Faculty of Ege University (in Turkish). E.U. Research Project, Final Report, Project No: 02-BIL-13, Bornova-İzmir, 38p.
  • Ueda, R., H. Sugita, Y. Deguchi. 1999. Effect of transportation on the serum bactericidal activity of Penaeus japonicus and Ovalipes punctatus. Aquaculture, 171: 221-225.
  • Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analsis, 3nd ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey, 662p.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gürel Türkmen

Osman Özden

Hülya Saygı

Publication Date March 1, 2007
Submission Date December 7, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2007Volume: 24 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Türkmen, G. ., Özden, O. ., & Saygı, H. . (2007). Yumurtalı Penaeid Karides (Marsupenaeus japonicus Bate, 1888 ve Penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844) Anaçlarının İki Farklı Yöntem ile Canlı Nakli. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 24(1), 109-112.