BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The common squid (Loligo vulgaris Lam., 1798) fishery with shrimp trammel net in Izmir Bay.

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 419 - 422, 01.09.2005

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akyol, O., G. Metin, 2001. Investigations on species composition and catch per trawl of cephalopods caught by bottom trawl in the bay of Izmir (Aegean Sea) (In Turkish) Ege Ü. Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 18:357- 365.
  • Anon, 2004, Fisheries regulation for marine and fresh waters for commercial fishery , 2004-2006 fishing period No.:36\1, (in Turkish) Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair of Turkey, Protect and Control General Office, Ankara, 71 p.
  • Caddy, J.F., P.G. Rodhouse, 1998. Cephalopod and groundfish landings: evidence for ecological change in global fisheries? Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 8: 431–444.
  • FAO, 2002. Yearbooks of Fishery Statistics Summary tables 2002.
  • Gökçe, G., 2004. Research on reduction of non-target species in shrimp trammel net. (InTurkish).PhD thesis, Ege University, Izmir,Turkey
  • Guerra, A., F. Rocha, 1994. The life history of Loligo vulgaris and Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Galician waters (NW Spain). Fish. Res. 21: 43-69.
  • Kara, Ö.F., R. Gurbet, 1999. Investigation on Industrial Fishery of the Aegean Sea. (In Turkish) Agriculture and Rural Affair Ministry, Fisheries Research Institution, Seri B, No., 5, Bodrum, 135 p
  • McKinnella, S., M.P., Seki, 1998. Shark bycatch in the Japanese high seas squid driftnet Fishery in the North Pacif Ocean. Fish. Res., 39: 127-138.
  • Metin, C., A. Ulaş, F.O. Düzbastılar, M.H. Kaykaç, 2003. The investigotion on application of the semimechanized jigging line for common squid (Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798) fishing. (In Turkish) 2000/SÜF/011 nolu proje, Ege Ü. Su Ürünleri Fakültesi, İzmir, 23.
  • Nomura, M., 1985. Fishing Techniques (3), Japan International Co-operation Agency, Tokyo, 108.
  • Rocha, F., M.A., Vega, 2003. Overview of cephalopod fisheries in Chilean waters. Fish. Res., 60: 151–159.
  • Rodhouse, P.G. 2001. Managing and forecasting squid fisheries in variable environments. Fish. Res. 54: 3–8.
  • Roper, C.F.E., M.J. Sweeney, C.E. Nauen, 1984. FAO species catalogue. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fish Synop. 3, 125: 1–277.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, H.A. Benli, 1998. Cephalopods of Turkey and Cephalopods Culture. (In Turkish) Agriculture and Rural Affair Ministry, Fisheries Research Institution, Seri A, No., 12, Bodrum, 143 p.
  • Sifner, S.K., N. Vrgoc, 2004,Population structure, maturation and reproduction of the European squid, Loligo vulgaris, in the Central Adriatic Sea. Fish. Res. 69: 239–249
  • Sparre, P., E. Ursin, S.C. Venema 1989. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment Part 1- Manual. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. No 306.1. Rome, FAO 337p.
  • Ulaş, A., F.O. Düzbastılar, C. Metin, Catch efficiency of jigging line fishing for common squid (Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798). (In Turkish) 17-23. In 1st National Malacology Congress Proceedings, 1-3 September 2004, Izmir. Öztürk, B and Salman, A. (Eds.), Published by Turkish Marine Research Foundation, İstanbul Turkey, 17-23.

İzmir Körfezi'nde Karides Uzatma Ağları ile Kalamar (Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798) Avcılığı.

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 419 - 422, 01.09.2005

Öz

Bu çalışmada İzmir Körfezi’nde kalamar (Loligo vulgaris) avcılığında kullanılan, yıpranmış çatılı karides uzatma ağlarının av verimin incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Ekim-Kasım 2003 arasında ticari balıkçılık koşulları altında 11 av operasyonu gerçekleştirilmiştir. Uzatma ağları ile 23 tür yakalanmış ve bu türlerin ağırlık olarak %66 sını kalamarın oluşturduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yakalanan 288 birey içerinde ortalama kalamar ağırlığı ve manto boyu sırasıyla, 166.7±6.834 gr ve18.2±0.307 cm olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, 26 adet/gün ve 4.13 kg/gün CPUE ile eskiyen karides uzatma ağları kalamar avcılığında etkili bir av aracı olarak İzmir Körfezi’nde kullanılmaya başlanmıştır

Kaynakça

  • Akyol, O., G. Metin, 2001. Investigations on species composition and catch per trawl of cephalopods caught by bottom trawl in the bay of Izmir (Aegean Sea) (In Turkish) Ege Ü. Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 18:357- 365.
  • Anon, 2004, Fisheries regulation for marine and fresh waters for commercial fishery , 2004-2006 fishing period No.:36\1, (in Turkish) Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair of Turkey, Protect and Control General Office, Ankara, 71 p.
  • Caddy, J.F., P.G. Rodhouse, 1998. Cephalopod and groundfish landings: evidence for ecological change in global fisheries? Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 8: 431–444.
  • FAO, 2002. Yearbooks of Fishery Statistics Summary tables 2002.
  • Gökçe, G., 2004. Research on reduction of non-target species in shrimp trammel net. (InTurkish).PhD thesis, Ege University, Izmir,Turkey
  • Guerra, A., F. Rocha, 1994. The life history of Loligo vulgaris and Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Galician waters (NW Spain). Fish. Res. 21: 43-69.
  • Kara, Ö.F., R. Gurbet, 1999. Investigation on Industrial Fishery of the Aegean Sea. (In Turkish) Agriculture and Rural Affair Ministry, Fisheries Research Institution, Seri B, No., 5, Bodrum, 135 p
  • McKinnella, S., M.P., Seki, 1998. Shark bycatch in the Japanese high seas squid driftnet Fishery in the North Pacif Ocean. Fish. Res., 39: 127-138.
  • Metin, C., A. Ulaş, F.O. Düzbastılar, M.H. Kaykaç, 2003. The investigotion on application of the semimechanized jigging line for common squid (Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798) fishing. (In Turkish) 2000/SÜF/011 nolu proje, Ege Ü. Su Ürünleri Fakültesi, İzmir, 23.
  • Nomura, M., 1985. Fishing Techniques (3), Japan International Co-operation Agency, Tokyo, 108.
  • Rocha, F., M.A., Vega, 2003. Overview of cephalopod fisheries in Chilean waters. Fish. Res., 60: 151–159.
  • Rodhouse, P.G. 2001. Managing and forecasting squid fisheries in variable environments. Fish. Res. 54: 3–8.
  • Roper, C.F.E., M.J. Sweeney, C.E. Nauen, 1984. FAO species catalogue. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fish Synop. 3, 125: 1–277.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, H.A. Benli, 1998. Cephalopods of Turkey and Cephalopods Culture. (In Turkish) Agriculture and Rural Affair Ministry, Fisheries Research Institution, Seri A, No., 12, Bodrum, 143 p.
  • Sifner, S.K., N. Vrgoc, 2004,Population structure, maturation and reproduction of the European squid, Loligo vulgaris, in the Central Adriatic Sea. Fish. Res. 69: 239–249
  • Sparre, P., E. Ursin, S.C. Venema 1989. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment Part 1- Manual. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. No 306.1. Rome, FAO 337p.
  • Ulaş, A., F.O. Düzbastılar, C. Metin, Catch efficiency of jigging line fishing for common squid (Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798). (In Turkish) 17-23. In 1st National Malacology Congress Proceedings, 1-3 September 2004, Izmir. Öztürk, B and Salman, A. (Eds.), Published by Turkish Marine Research Foundation, İstanbul Turkey, 17-23.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gökhan Gökçe

Cengiz Metin

İlker Aydın

İsa Bayramiç

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2005
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Aralık 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Gökçe, G. ., Metin, C. ., Aydın, İ. ., Bayramiç, İ. . (2005). İzmir Körfezi’nde Karides Uzatma Ağları ile Kalamar (Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798) Avcılığı. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 22(3), 419-422.