Su Ürünleri Dergisi
 
PDF BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yerleştirilmesi amaçlanan yapay resifler için paydaşların kararları: Analitik hiyerarşi süreci yaklaşımı.

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 21 - 29, 01.03.2012

Sezgin TUNCA Bülent MİRAN Vahdet ÜNAL

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Alphonce, C., 1997. Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries. Agricultural Systems, 53:97-112. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00035-2
  • Asafu-Adjaye, J., Tapsuwan, S., 2008. A contingent valuation study of scuba diving benefits: Case study in Mu Ko Similan Marine National Park. Tourism Management, 29(6):1122-1130. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.005
  • Braunschweig, T., Becker, B., 2004. Choosing research priorities by using the analytic hierarchy process: an application to international agriculture. R&D Management, 34:77-86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00324.x
  • Ditton, R.B., Osburn, H.R., Baker, T.L., Thailing, C.E., 2002. Demographics, attitudes, and reef management preferences of sport divers in offshore Texas waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59:186-191. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1188
  • Forman, E.H., Selly, M.A., 2000. Decision by Objectives, How to Convince Others That You are Right. World Scientific. Singapore, 402 p.
  • Gómez-Limón, J., Atance, I., 2004. Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26:1045-1071. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.07.005
  • Gómez-Limón, J.A., Riesgo, L., 2008. Alternative approaches on constructing a composite indicator to measure agricultural sustainability. The Proceedings of the 107th EAAE Seminar. "Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies". January 29th-February 1st, Sevilla, Spain. 324 p.
  • Greene, W., 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. 206 p.
  • Gujarati, N.D., 2004. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill. Forth Edition, USA.
  • Guo, L.S., He, Y.S. 1999. Integrated multi-criteria decision model: a case study for the allocation of facilities in Chinese agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73:87-94. doi:10.1006/jaer.1998.0393
  • Günden, C., Miran, B., 2008. Analysis of Farmers’ Fundemantal Farm Management Decisions in Terms of Priority and Getting Support (in Turkish with English abstract). Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2):67- 80.
  • Günden, C., Miran, B., Uysal, Ö.K., Bektaş, Z.K., 2008. Determination of Consumer Preferences for Purchasing Place of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Considered Food Safety, Quality and Price by using Analytic Hierarchy Process in İzmir (in Turkish with English abstract). Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 45(522):29-40.
  • Hiett, R., Milon, J.W., 2002. Economic Impact of Recreational fishing and Diving Associated with Offshore Oil and Gas Structures in the Gulf of Mexico. DOI Minerals Management Service Document MMS Study, 10 p.
  • Johns, G., Leeworthy, V.R., Bell, F.W., Bonn, M.A., 2001. Socioeconomic Study of Reefs in Southeast Florida Final Report prepared for Miami- Dade County, Florida by Hazen and Sawyer P.C. Miami, FL. 348 p.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6):382-394. doi:10.1108/09576050310503367
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D., 2004. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using Fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey”. International Journal of Production Economics, 87:171-184. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9
  • Karami, E., 2006. Appropriateness of farmers’ adoption of irrigation methods: The application of the AHP model. Agricultural Systems, 87:101-119. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.01.001
  • Kauko, T., 2006. Expressions of housing consumer preferences: Proposition for a research agenda housing. Theory and Society, 23(2):92-108. doi:10.1080/14036090600773097
  • Ko, W.H., Chiu, C.P., 2006. A new coffee shop location planning for customer satisfaction in Taiwan. International Journal of the Information Systems for Logistics and Management (IJISLM), 2(1):55-62.
  • Kong, F., Liu, H., 2005. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce. International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, 1(3-4):406-412.
  • Mainuddin, M., Gupta, A., Onta, P., 1997. Optimal crop planning model for an existing groundwater irrigation project in Thailand. Agricultural Water Management, 33:43-62. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(96)01278-4
  • Milon, J.W., 1988. Travel Cost Methods For Estimating The Recreational Use Benefits Of Artificial Marine Habitat. Southern Journal Of Agricultural Economics, 87-101.
  • Milon, J.W., Holland, S.M., Whitmarsh, D.J., 2000. Artificial Reef Evaluation With Application To Natural Marine Habitats. CRC Press. 246 p.
  • Miran, B., 2003. Basic Statistics (in Turkish). Ege University Press. ISBN 975- 9308800, Bornova, İzmir. 297 p.
  • Morgana, O.A., Massey, D.M., Huth, W.L., Hall, R., 2008. Demand for Diving on Large Ship Artificial Reefs. Marine Resource Economics, 24:43-59.
  • Oh, C, Ditton, R.B., Stoll, J.R., 2008. The Economic Value of Scuba-Diving Use of Natural and Artificial Reef Habitats. Society & Natural Resources, 21(6):455-468. doi:10.1080/08941920701681953
  • Parra-López, C., Calatrava-Requena, J., 2006. A multifunctional comparison of conventional versus alternative olive systems in Spain by using AHP. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Gold Coast, August 12-18, Australia.
  • Pendleton, L.H., 2004. Creating Underwater Value: The Economic Value of Artificial Reefs for Recreational Diving. Report of Program in Environmental Science and Engineering Department of Environmental Health Sciences University of California, Los Angeles California Artificial Reef Enhancement Division. 234 p.
  • Prakash, T.N., 2003. Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach. Master of Science Thesis. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation. Enschede, The Netherlands. 57 p.
  • Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Karami, E., 2008. A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environment Development and Sustainability, 10:407-426. doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9072-1
  • Qureshi, M.E., Harrison, S.R., 2003. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to piparian revegetation policy options. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2(3):441-458. doi:10.1007/s11842-003-0030-6
  • Ramos, J., Santos, M.N., Whitmarsh, D., Monteiro, C.C., 2006. The Usefulness of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Understanding Reef Diving Choices: A Case Study. Bulletin of Marine Science, 78(1):213- 219.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York. 287 p.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1990. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48:9-26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  • Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., Dellmann, K., 2003. The allocation of intangible resources: the analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37:169–184. doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00039-3
  • Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1: 83-98. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • Simona, M., Romana, B., 2006. Multifunctional agriculture: values and preferences of society. International Scientific Days 2006, "Competitivness in the EU Challenge for the V4 countries". Faculty of Economic and Management SAU in Nitra. 267-273.
  • Sutton, S.G., Bushnell, S.L., 2007. Socio economic aspects of artificial reefs Considerations for the Great Barrier. Ocean & Coastal Management, 50:829-846. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.01.003
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI), 2011. The Results of Address Based Population Registration System. <www.tuik.gov.tr>
  • Wang, M., Liu, P., Ou, G., 2007. The Evaluation study of customer satisfaction based on gray–AHP Method for B2C Electronic-Commerce Enterprise. Engineering Letters, 15(1):157-162.
  • Whitmarsh, D, Santos, M.N., Ramos, J., Monteiro, C.C., 2008. Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs of the Algarve (southern Portugal): An economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51(6):463-468. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.04.004

Decisions of stakeholders for the proposed artificial reef deployment: Analytic hierarchy process approach.

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 21 - 29, 01.03.2012

Sezgin TUNCA Bülent MİRAN Vahdet ÜNAL

Öz

Bugüne kadar Türkiye’de yapay resif alanlarının etkin kullanımı ve paylaşımıyla ilgili ticari balıkçılar, amatör balıkçılar ve yöre sakinlerini ele alan farklı enhancement, ARs creates services for scuba divers and fish enhancement tool in marine area. Beyond fish

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay resifler, Paydaşlar, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Karar verme

Kaynakça

  • Alphonce, C., 1997. Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries. Agricultural Systems, 53:97-112. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00035-2
  • Asafu-Adjaye, J., Tapsuwan, S., 2008. A contingent valuation study of scuba diving benefits: Case study in Mu Ko Similan Marine National Park. Tourism Management, 29(6):1122-1130. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.005
  • Braunschweig, T., Becker, B., 2004. Choosing research priorities by using the analytic hierarchy process: an application to international agriculture. R&D Management, 34:77-86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00324.x
  • Ditton, R.B., Osburn, H.R., Baker, T.L., Thailing, C.E., 2002. Demographics, attitudes, and reef management preferences of sport divers in offshore Texas waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59:186-191. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1188
  • Forman, E.H., Selly, M.A., 2000. Decision by Objectives, How to Convince Others That You are Right. World Scientific. Singapore, 402 p.
  • Gómez-Limón, J., Atance, I., 2004. Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26:1045-1071. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.07.005
  • Gómez-Limón, J.A., Riesgo, L., 2008. Alternative approaches on constructing a composite indicator to measure agricultural sustainability. The Proceedings of the 107th EAAE Seminar. "Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies". January 29th-February 1st, Sevilla, Spain. 324 p.
  • Greene, W., 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. 206 p.
  • Gujarati, N.D., 2004. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill. Forth Edition, USA.
  • Guo, L.S., He, Y.S. 1999. Integrated multi-criteria decision model: a case study for the allocation of facilities in Chinese agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73:87-94. doi:10.1006/jaer.1998.0393
  • Günden, C., Miran, B., 2008. Analysis of Farmers’ Fundemantal Farm Management Decisions in Terms of Priority and Getting Support (in Turkish with English abstract). Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2):67- 80.
  • Günden, C., Miran, B., Uysal, Ö.K., Bektaş, Z.K., 2008. Determination of Consumer Preferences for Purchasing Place of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Considered Food Safety, Quality and Price by using Analytic Hierarchy Process in İzmir (in Turkish with English abstract). Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 45(522):29-40.
  • Hiett, R., Milon, J.W., 2002. Economic Impact of Recreational fishing and Diving Associated with Offshore Oil and Gas Structures in the Gulf of Mexico. DOI Minerals Management Service Document MMS Study, 10 p.
  • Johns, G., Leeworthy, V.R., Bell, F.W., Bonn, M.A., 2001. Socioeconomic Study of Reefs in Southeast Florida Final Report prepared for Miami- Dade County, Florida by Hazen and Sawyer P.C. Miami, FL. 348 p.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6):382-394. doi:10.1108/09576050310503367
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D., 2004. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using Fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey”. International Journal of Production Economics, 87:171-184. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9
  • Karami, E., 2006. Appropriateness of farmers’ adoption of irrigation methods: The application of the AHP model. Agricultural Systems, 87:101-119. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.01.001
  • Kauko, T., 2006. Expressions of housing consumer preferences: Proposition for a research agenda housing. Theory and Society, 23(2):92-108. doi:10.1080/14036090600773097
  • Ko, W.H., Chiu, C.P., 2006. A new coffee shop location planning for customer satisfaction in Taiwan. International Journal of the Information Systems for Logistics and Management (IJISLM), 2(1):55-62.
  • Kong, F., Liu, H., 2005. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce. International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, 1(3-4):406-412.
  • Mainuddin, M., Gupta, A., Onta, P., 1997. Optimal crop planning model for an existing groundwater irrigation project in Thailand. Agricultural Water Management, 33:43-62. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(96)01278-4
  • Milon, J.W., 1988. Travel Cost Methods For Estimating The Recreational Use Benefits Of Artificial Marine Habitat. Southern Journal Of Agricultural Economics, 87-101.
  • Milon, J.W., Holland, S.M., Whitmarsh, D.J., 2000. Artificial Reef Evaluation With Application To Natural Marine Habitats. CRC Press. 246 p.
  • Miran, B., 2003. Basic Statistics (in Turkish). Ege University Press. ISBN 975- 9308800, Bornova, İzmir. 297 p.
  • Morgana, O.A., Massey, D.M., Huth, W.L., Hall, R., 2008. Demand for Diving on Large Ship Artificial Reefs. Marine Resource Economics, 24:43-59.
  • Oh, C, Ditton, R.B., Stoll, J.R., 2008. The Economic Value of Scuba-Diving Use of Natural and Artificial Reef Habitats. Society & Natural Resources, 21(6):455-468. doi:10.1080/08941920701681953
  • Parra-López, C., Calatrava-Requena, J., 2006. A multifunctional comparison of conventional versus alternative olive systems in Spain by using AHP. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Gold Coast, August 12-18, Australia.
  • Pendleton, L.H., 2004. Creating Underwater Value: The Economic Value of Artificial Reefs for Recreational Diving. Report of Program in Environmental Science and Engineering Department of Environmental Health Sciences University of California, Los Angeles California Artificial Reef Enhancement Division. 234 p.
  • Prakash, T.N., 2003. Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach. Master of Science Thesis. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation. Enschede, The Netherlands. 57 p.
  • Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Karami, E., 2008. A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environment Development and Sustainability, 10:407-426. doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9072-1
  • Qureshi, M.E., Harrison, S.R., 2003. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to piparian revegetation policy options. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2(3):441-458. doi:10.1007/s11842-003-0030-6
  • Ramos, J., Santos, M.N., Whitmarsh, D., Monteiro, C.C., 2006. The Usefulness of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Understanding Reef Diving Choices: A Case Study. Bulletin of Marine Science, 78(1):213- 219.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York. 287 p.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1990. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48:9-26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  • Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., Dellmann, K., 2003. The allocation of intangible resources: the analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37:169–184. doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00039-3
  • Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1: 83-98. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • Simona, M., Romana, B., 2006. Multifunctional agriculture: values and preferences of society. International Scientific Days 2006, "Competitivness in the EU Challenge for the V4 countries". Faculty of Economic and Management SAU in Nitra. 267-273.
  • Sutton, S.G., Bushnell, S.L., 2007. Socio economic aspects of artificial reefs Considerations for the Great Barrier. Ocean & Coastal Management, 50:829-846. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.01.003
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI), 2011. The Results of Address Based Population Registration System. <www.tuik.gov.tr>
  • Wang, M., Liu, P., Ou, G., 2007. The Evaluation study of customer satisfaction based on gray–AHP Method for B2C Electronic-Commerce Enterprise. Engineering Letters, 15(1):157-162.
  • Whitmarsh, D, Santos, M.N., Ramos, J., Monteiro, C.C., 2008. Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs of the Algarve (southern Portugal): An economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51(6):463-468. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.04.004

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Sezgin TUNCA

Bülent MİRAN

Vahdet ÜNAL

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2012
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Aralık 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
TUNCA, S. ., MİRAN, B. ., & ÜNAL, V. . (2012). Decisions of stakeholders for the proposed artificial reef deployment: Analytic hierarchy process approach. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 29(1), 21-29.