Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Balıkçılık ihracatında majör ülkelerle Türkiye’nin rekabet gücünün karşılaştırmalı analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3, 263 - 271, 10.09.2025

Elif Tuğçe Bozduman , Birol Erkan

https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.3.09

Öz

Çalışmada, dünyada en fazla su ürünleri ihracatı yapan 10 ülkenin ve Türkiye'nin ihracat rekabet gücü, Normalize Edilmiş Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler (NRCA) yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analize dahil edilen 42 balıkçılık ürünü, Standart Uluslararası Ticaret Sınıflandırması (SITC) revizyon 3 kategorisindeki 5 basamaklı ürün grubudur. Analiz sonuçları, 11 ülke arasında balıkçılık ürünlerinde rekabet gücünün en yüksek olduğu ülkelerin Çin, Norveç, Ekvador, Şili ve İsveç olduğunu göstermektedir. Rekabet gücünün en düşük olduğu ülke ise Türkiye'dir. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye'nin balıkçılık sektöründeki rekabet gücünü artırabilmesi için teknolojiyi bu alanda aktif olarak kullanması, su ürünleri popülasyonunu artırmaya yönelik çevre dostu politikalar uygulaması ve deniz kirliliğine (özellikle müsilaj sorunları vb.) karşı önlem alması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Balıkçılık ürünleri ihracat rekabet gücü NRCA analizi Türkiye

Kaynakça

  • Ali, E.M., Elahi, E., Shahriar, S., & Rana, M.S. (2024). Does government intervention promote export competitiveness? An empirical case study of Bangladesh seafood exports. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2024.2387705
  • Alsaleh, M., Yuan, Y., & Longqi, S. (2024). Do global competitiveness factors impact the marine sustainability practices? An empirical evidence from fisheries sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33, 6671–6688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3839
  • Aydemir, M.F. (2022). Türkiye’s peach and nectarine exports: An empirical analysis with normalized revealed comparative advantage (NRCA) indexes. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 30(1), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1560294
  • Cao, X., & Shen, X. (2023). Regional disparities and dynamic evolution of competitiveness of marine fish aquaculture industry-A study of China. Aquatic Living Resources, 36(31), 1 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2023027
  • COMTRADE. (2025, 02 12). World Integrated Trade Solutions. https://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/Restricted/Login.aspx
  • Carrazco-Escalante, J.C., Rojo-Urrea, R., Tong-Núñez, S.R.I., & León-Balderrama, J.I. (2024). Shrimp aquaculture, absorption capacity and competitiveness: an analysis based on the case of Ahome, Mexico. Agro Productividad. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v17i10.2899
  • Dai, Y.-Y., Yuan, Y.M., Yuan, Y., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, H.Y. (2020). Competitiveness of Chinese and Indonesian tilapia exports in the US market. Aquaculture International, 28, 791 804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00496-x
  • Deb, K., & Sengupta, B. (2016). On Empirical Distribution of RCA Indices. Guwahati: Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74087/
  • Demir, G., Aydın, Ü., & Utkulu, U. (2024). Measuring the competitiveness of Türkiye’s industries against the European Union according to the technology intensity: An evaluation within the framework of the customs union revision. Ege Academic Review, 24(2), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1380681
  • Demir, N., & Aksoy, A. (2021). Competitive power of Türkiye’s aquaculture sector and comparison with other leading countries. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 10(3), 258 268. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.937890
  • Destiningsih, R., Sugiharti, R.R., Laut, L.T., Safiah, S.N., & Achsa, A. (2020). Competitiveness identification of fisheries export in Indonesia. The 5th International Conference on Tropical and Coastal Region Eco Development (1-13). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/530/1/012017
  • Engle, C.R., & Stone, N.M. (2013). Competitiveness of U.S. aquaculture within the current U.S. regulatory framework. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 17(3), 251 280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2013.812158
  • Erkan, B., & Bozduman, E.T. (2022). The Global Competitive Structure of ASEAN Countries in Innovative Products. In V. Ratten, J. Leitão (Eds.), Context-based Entrepreneurship. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05307-8_4
  • Erokhin, V., Tianming, G., & Ivolga, A. (2021). Cross-country potentials and advantages in trade in fish and seafood products in the RCEP member states. Sustainability, 13, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073668
  • Fakhrudin, U., Hastiadi, F.F., & Haidir, B.M. (2019). Impact analysis of normalized revealed comparative advantage on ASEAN’s non-oil and gas export pattern using a gravity model approach. In F. F. Hastiadi (Ed.), Globalization, Productivity and Production Networks in ASEAN Enhancing Regional Trade and Investment, 105-145. SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16510-9_5
  • Galvão, A.K., Lima, T.B., & Júnior, S.M. (2005). Environmental management and competitiveness: A Survey on environmental awareness in shrimp producers in the State of Rio Grande do Norte in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2(2), 75 86. https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV2N2_2005_P5
  • Girard, S., & Daures, F. (2015). Strategic Use of Competitiveness Towards Consolidating The Economic Sustainability of The European Seafood Sector. European Commission.
  • Huu, A.T. (2018). Competitive assessment factors of seafood exporters in Vietnam. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 4(11), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.4(11).2018.17-28
  • Ismail, M.M., & Abdullah, A.M. (2013). Shrimp Trade competitiveness of Malaysia and selected ASEAN countries. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 25(1), 98 115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2013.800009
  • Khan, A., Hossain, E., Islam, S., Rahman, T., & Dey, M.M. (2023). Shrimp export competitiveness and its determinants: a novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 27(2), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2022.2089772
  • Khanal, N.B., & Deb, U. (2022). Fish and fishery products trade by India: Trends, competitiveness, and comparative advantage. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development (AJAD), 19(2), 51 71. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2022.19.2.5
  • Klasra, M.A., & Fidan, H. (2005). Competitiveness of major exporting countries and Türkiye in the world fishery market: A constant market share analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 9(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300500234235
  • Martinez, P.R., Molnar, J., Trejos, E., Meyer, D., Meyer S.D. & Tollner W. (2004). Cluster membership as a competitive advantage in aquacultural development: Case study of tilapia producers in Olancho, Honduras. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 8(5-6), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300409380370
  • Polymeros, K., Tsakiridou, E., & Mattas, K. (2005). Assessing the competitiveness of EU Mediterranean fisheries and aquaculture industries. In K.J. Thomson, L. Venzi (Eds.), The Economics of Aquaculture with respect to Fisheries (161-171). Rome: Agecon Search. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.56004
  • Somasekharan, J.K., Harilal, K.N., & Parameswaran M. (2013). Coping with the standards regime: Analyzing export competitiveness of Indian seafood industry. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2(1), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v2n1p98
  • Sukmaya, S.G., & Saptana, S. (2021). The Impact of trade war toward against Indonesian agriculture export products product. International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development, (1-13). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123202001
  • Suryana, A.A., & Nurmahendra, D.T. (2021). Analysis of the competitiveness of ponds aquaculture in west Java province. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 14(1), 43 57. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2021/v14i130289
  • Tri, N.G., & Thanh, N.V. (2022). Studying the impact of factors affecting competitiveness in seafood export enterprises: A case in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Central European Management Journal, 30(4), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.30.4.38
  • Uzmanoğlu, M.S., & Arslan, F.M. (2020). Dynamics of competition in the marine aquaculture industry: A research on Türkiye. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 16(2), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.619093
  • Wosiek, R., & Visvizi, A. (2021). The VWRCA index: measuring a country’s comparative advantage and specialization in services. the case of Poland. Economies, 9(48), 1 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020048
  • Yıldırım, Ç., Türkten, H., & Ceyhan, V. (2022). Evaluation of competitiveness power of fishing and aquaculture industry in Türkiye. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39(3), 243 252. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.39.3.10

Comparative analysis of Türkiye's competitiveness with major countries in fisheries exports

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3, 263 - 271, 10.09.2025

Elif Tuğçe Bozduman , Birol Erkan

https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.3.09

Öz

In the study, the export competitiveness of the 10 countries that export the most fisheries products in the world and Türkiye was analyzed using the Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantages (NRCA) method. The 42 fisheries products included in the analysis are subject to a 5-digit classification in the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 category. The analysis results show that the countries with the highest competitiveness in fisheries products among 11 countries are China, Norway, Ecuador, Chile and Sweden. The country with the lowest competitive power is Türkiye. In this context, for Türkiye to increase its competitive power in the fishing sector, it needs to use technology actively in this field, implement environmentally friendly policies to increase the population of fishing products, and take precautions against marine pollution (especially mucilage problems, etc.).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fisheries products export competitiveness NRCA analysis Türkiye

Kaynakça

  • Ali, E.M., Elahi, E., Shahriar, S., & Rana, M.S. (2024). Does government intervention promote export competitiveness? An empirical case study of Bangladesh seafood exports. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2024.2387705
  • Alsaleh, M., Yuan, Y., & Longqi, S. (2024). Do global competitiveness factors impact the marine sustainability practices? An empirical evidence from fisheries sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33, 6671–6688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3839
  • Aydemir, M.F. (2022). Türkiye’s peach and nectarine exports: An empirical analysis with normalized revealed comparative advantage (NRCA) indexes. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 30(1), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1560294
  • Cao, X., & Shen, X. (2023). Regional disparities and dynamic evolution of competitiveness of marine fish aquaculture industry-A study of China. Aquatic Living Resources, 36(31), 1 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2023027
  • COMTRADE. (2025, 02 12). World Integrated Trade Solutions. https://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/Restricted/Login.aspx
  • Carrazco-Escalante, J.C., Rojo-Urrea, R., Tong-Núñez, S.R.I., & León-Balderrama, J.I. (2024). Shrimp aquaculture, absorption capacity and competitiveness: an analysis based on the case of Ahome, Mexico. Agro Productividad. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v17i10.2899
  • Dai, Y.-Y., Yuan, Y.M., Yuan, Y., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, H.Y. (2020). Competitiveness of Chinese and Indonesian tilapia exports in the US market. Aquaculture International, 28, 791 804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00496-x
  • Deb, K., & Sengupta, B. (2016). On Empirical Distribution of RCA Indices. Guwahati: Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74087/
  • Demir, G., Aydın, Ü., & Utkulu, U. (2024). Measuring the competitiveness of Türkiye’s industries against the European Union according to the technology intensity: An evaluation within the framework of the customs union revision. Ege Academic Review, 24(2), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1380681
  • Demir, N., & Aksoy, A. (2021). Competitive power of Türkiye’s aquaculture sector and comparison with other leading countries. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 10(3), 258 268. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.937890
  • Destiningsih, R., Sugiharti, R.R., Laut, L.T., Safiah, S.N., & Achsa, A. (2020). Competitiveness identification of fisheries export in Indonesia. The 5th International Conference on Tropical and Coastal Region Eco Development (1-13). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/530/1/012017
  • Engle, C.R., & Stone, N.M. (2013). Competitiveness of U.S. aquaculture within the current U.S. regulatory framework. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 17(3), 251 280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2013.812158
  • Erkan, B., & Bozduman, E.T. (2022). The Global Competitive Structure of ASEAN Countries in Innovative Products. In V. Ratten, J. Leitão (Eds.), Context-based Entrepreneurship. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05307-8_4
  • Erokhin, V., Tianming, G., & Ivolga, A. (2021). Cross-country potentials and advantages in trade in fish and seafood products in the RCEP member states. Sustainability, 13, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073668
  • Fakhrudin, U., Hastiadi, F.F., & Haidir, B.M. (2019). Impact analysis of normalized revealed comparative advantage on ASEAN’s non-oil and gas export pattern using a gravity model approach. In F. F. Hastiadi (Ed.), Globalization, Productivity and Production Networks in ASEAN Enhancing Regional Trade and Investment, 105-145. SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16510-9_5
  • Galvão, A.K., Lima, T.B., & Júnior, S.M. (2005). Environmental management and competitiveness: A Survey on environmental awareness in shrimp producers in the State of Rio Grande do Norte in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2(2), 75 86. https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV2N2_2005_P5
  • Girard, S., & Daures, F. (2015). Strategic Use of Competitiveness Towards Consolidating The Economic Sustainability of The European Seafood Sector. European Commission.
  • Huu, A.T. (2018). Competitive assessment factors of seafood exporters in Vietnam. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 4(11), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.4(11).2018.17-28
  • Ismail, M.M., & Abdullah, A.M. (2013). Shrimp Trade competitiveness of Malaysia and selected ASEAN countries. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 25(1), 98 115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2013.800009
  • Khan, A., Hossain, E., Islam, S., Rahman, T., & Dey, M.M. (2023). Shrimp export competitiveness and its determinants: a novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 27(2), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2022.2089772
  • Khanal, N.B., & Deb, U. (2022). Fish and fishery products trade by India: Trends, competitiveness, and comparative advantage. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development (AJAD), 19(2), 51 71. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2022.19.2.5
  • Klasra, M.A., & Fidan, H. (2005). Competitiveness of major exporting countries and Türkiye in the world fishery market: A constant market share analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 9(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300500234235
  • Martinez, P.R., Molnar, J., Trejos, E., Meyer, D., Meyer S.D. & Tollner W. (2004). Cluster membership as a competitive advantage in aquacultural development: Case study of tilapia producers in Olancho, Honduras. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 8(5-6), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300409380370
  • Polymeros, K., Tsakiridou, E., & Mattas, K. (2005). Assessing the competitiveness of EU Mediterranean fisheries and aquaculture industries. In K.J. Thomson, L. Venzi (Eds.), The Economics of Aquaculture with respect to Fisheries (161-171). Rome: Agecon Search. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.56004
  • Somasekharan, J.K., Harilal, K.N., & Parameswaran M. (2013). Coping with the standards regime: Analyzing export competitiveness of Indian seafood industry. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2(1), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v2n1p98
  • Sukmaya, S.G., & Saptana, S. (2021). The Impact of trade war toward against Indonesian agriculture export products product. International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development, (1-13). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123202001
  • Suryana, A.A., & Nurmahendra, D.T. (2021). Analysis of the competitiveness of ponds aquaculture in west Java province. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 14(1), 43 57. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2021/v14i130289
  • Tri, N.G., & Thanh, N.V. (2022). Studying the impact of factors affecting competitiveness in seafood export enterprises: A case in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Central European Management Journal, 30(4), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.30.4.38
  • Uzmanoğlu, M.S., & Arslan, F.M. (2020). Dynamics of competition in the marine aquaculture industry: A research on Türkiye. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 16(2), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.619093
  • Wosiek, R., & Visvizi, A. (2021). The VWRCA index: measuring a country’s comparative advantage and specialization in services. the case of Poland. Economies, 9(48), 1 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020048
  • Yıldırım, Ç., Türkten, H., & Ceyhan, V. (2022). Evaluation of competitiveness power of fishing and aquaculture industry in Türkiye. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39(3), 243 252. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.39.3.10
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Balıkçılık Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Elif Tuğçe Bozduman 0000-0002-6145-8571

Birol Erkan 0000-0001-8363-5543

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 1 Eylül 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Eylül 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Haziran 2025
Kabul Tarihi 12 Ağustos 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Bozduman, E. T., & Erkan, B. (2025). Comparative analysis of Türkiye’s competitiveness with major countries in fisheries exports. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42(3), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.3.09