Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery

Cilt: 37 Sayı: 3 15 Eylül 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery

Öz



Microalgal culture is a key procedure in marine fish hatcheries, but this activity is far from optimized and has several problems remain to be solved. Nannochloropsis oculata are important to live feed organisms, which are used to rear the larvae of marine finfish. N. oculata were cultivated in tubular PBR and FRP panel PBR in a greenhouse. Tubular PBR was reached 701.7 x 106 cells mL-1 as its maximum cell density and FRP panel PBR was reached 245 x 106 cells mL-1 as maximum. Also, estimated maximum dry weights of tubular and FRP panel PBRs were calculated as 3.249 g L-1 and 1.47 g L-1, respectively. Consequently, tubular PBR was showed that it is more efficient than FRP panel PBR in this study.




Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Ashokkumar, V., Agila, E., Sivakumar, P., Salam, Z., Rengasamy, R. & Ani, F. N. (2014). Optimization and characterization of biodiesel production from microalgae Botryococcus grown at semi-continuous system. Energy Conversion and Management, 88, 936-946. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.019
  2. Boeing, P. (2000). Larval feed alternatives. Global Aquaculture Advocate 3 (1):48-50.
  3. Briassoulis, D., Panagakis, P., Chionidis, M., Tzenos, D., Lalos, A., Tsinos, C. & Jacobsen, A. (2010). An experimental helical-tubular photobioreactor for continuous production of Nannochloropsis sp. Bioresource Technology, 101(17), 6768-6777. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.103
  4. Brown, M.R., Mular, M., Miller, I., Farmer, C. & Trenerry, C. (1999). The vitamin content of microalgae used in aquaculture. Journal of Applied Phycology, 11(3), 247-255. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008075903578
  5. Del Campo, J. A., García-González, M. & Guerrero, M.G. (2007). Outdoor cultivation of microalgae for carotenoid production: current state and perspectives. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 74(6), 1163-1174. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-0844-9
  6. Dogaris, I., Welch, M., Meiser, A., Walmsley, L. & Philippidis, G. (2015). A novel horizontal photobioreactor for high-density cultivation of microalgae. Bioresource Technology, 198, 316-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.030
  7. Durmaz, Y. (2007). Vitamin E (α-tocopherol) production by the marine microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata (Eustigmatophyceae) in nitrogen limitation. Aquaculture, 272(1), 717-722. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.07.213
  8. Durmaz, Y., Donato, M., Monteiro, M., Gouveia, L., Nunes, M. L., Gama Pereira, T., Gokpinar, S. & Bandarra, N. M. (2008). Effect of Temperature on Growth and Biochemical Composition (Sterols, α-tocopherol, Carotenoids, Fatty Acid Profiles) of the Microalga, Isochrysis galbana. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh, 60(3), 188-195.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Yapısal Biyoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Gökhun Çağatay Erbil
0000-0002-6704-5073
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Eylül 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Ekim 2019

Kabul Tarihi

8 Mayıs 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Durmaz, Y., & Erbil, G. Ç. (2020). Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(3), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13
AMA
1.Durmaz Y, Erbil GÇ. Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery. EgeJFAS. 2020;37(3):303-308. doi:10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13
Chicago
Durmaz, Yaşar, ve Gökhun Çağatay Erbil. 2020. “Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery”. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37 (3): 303-8. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13.
EndNote
Durmaz Y, Erbil GÇ (01 Eylül 2020) Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37 3 303–308.
IEEE
[1]Y. Durmaz ve G. Ç. Erbil, “Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery”, EgeJFAS, c. 37, sy 3, ss. 303–308, Eyl. 2020, doi: 10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13.
ISNAD
Durmaz, Yaşar - Erbil, Gökhun Çağatay. “Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery”. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37/3 (01 Eylül 2020): 303-308. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13.
JAMA
1.Durmaz Y, Erbil GÇ. Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery. EgeJFAS. 2020;37:303–308.
MLA
Durmaz, Yaşar, ve Gökhun Çağatay Erbil. “Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery”. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, c. 37, sy 3, Eylül 2020, ss. 303-8, doi:10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13.
Vancouver
1.Yaşar Durmaz, Gökhun Çağatay Erbil. Comparison of Industrial-scale Tubular Photobioreactor to FRP (Fiberglass reinforced plastic) Panel Photobioreactor on Outdoor Culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the Marine Hatchery. EgeJFAS. 01 Eylül 2020;37(3):303-8. doi:10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13

Cited By