Araştırma Makalesi

Detection of moving fish schools using reinforcement learning technique

Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1 8 Mart 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Detection of moving fish schools using reinforcement learning technique

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to contribute to the fishing sector by determining the locations of moving fish schools. With the Q-Learning algorithm, areas where fish schools are frequently seen were marked and autonomous ships were able to reach these areas faster. With the Q-Learning algorithm, one of the machine learning techniques, areas where fish schools are abundant were determined and reward and penalty points were given to each region. In addition, the fish density matrix of the region was extracted thanks to the autonomous systems. Moreover, the algorithm can be automatically updated according to fish species and fishing bans. A different Q-Gain matrix was kept for each fish species to be caught, allowing autonomous ships to move according to the gain matrix. In short, high gains were achieved in terms of time and travel costs in finding or following fish schools by recognizing the region by autonomous ships.

Keywords

Etik Beyan

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Kaynakça

  1. Angiuli, A., Fouque, J.P., & Laurière, M. (2022). Unified reinforcement Q-learning for mean field game and control problems. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 34(2), 217 271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-021-00310-1
  2. Aydındağ Bayrak, E., Kırcı, P., Ensari, T., Seven, E., & Dağtekin, M. (2022). Diagnosing breast cancer using machine learning methods. (in Turkish with English abstract) Journal of Intelligent Systems: Theory and Applications, 5(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.38016/jista.966517
  3. Barto, A.G., Bradtke, S.J., & Singh, S.P. (1995). Learning to act using real-time dynamic programming. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1-2), 81-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00011-O
  4. Chapman, D., & Kaelbling, L.P. (1991). Input generalization in delayed reinforcement learning: An algorithm and performance comparisons. Proceedings of the 1991. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 726–731 pp., Sydney, Australia.
  5. Christiano, P.F., Leike, J., Brown, T., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03741
  6. D'Eramo, C., Cini, A., Nuara, A., Pirotta, M., Alippi, C., Peters, J., & Restelli, M. (2021). Gaussian approximation for bias reduction in Q-learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(277), 1-51.
  7. D'Eramo, C., Nuara, A., Pirotta, M., & Restelli, M. (2017). Estimating the maximum expected value in continuous reinforcement learning problems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1), 1846-1846.
  8. Dayan, P. (1993). Improving generalization for temporal difference learning: The successor representation. Neural Computation, 5(4), 613-624. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1993.5.4.613

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Balıkçılık Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

8 Mart 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Eylül 2024

Kabul Tarihi

15 Ocak 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bayraktar, M. Y. (2025). Detection of moving fish schools using reinforcement learning technique. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.1.03