Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=5emf64FjMvdO91k56yF6uCG4dB0jG_0GoXlx6t7cjy4&_path=id%3D68119%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Dtr%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
 
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Effects of shelter on adaptation to controlled conditions of musky octopus (Eledone moschata Lamarck, 1799).

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 453 - 456, 01.09.2005

Halil Şen

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Akyol O., G. Metin, 2001. Investigations on species composition and catch per trawl of cephalopods caught by bottom trawl in the Bay of Izmir (Aegean Sea). (in Turkish). Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt, 2, 2: 381-385.
  • Anon, 2002. The State of The World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2002. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  • Baltazar, P., P. Rodriguez, W.R.V. Valdivieso, 2000. Cultivo experimantal de Octopus mimus Gould 1852 en el Peru. Rev. Peru. Biol., 7(2):151-160.
  • Boletzky, S.V., 1975. Le développment d’Eledone moschata (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) élevée au laboratoire. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 100: 361-367.
  • Boletzky, S.V., R.T. Hanlon, 1983. A review of the laboratory maintenance, rearing and culture of cephalopod molluscs. Memoirs of the Nationa. Museum of Victoria. Stone, D.M. ed. 44:147-187.
  • Borer K.T., 1971. Control of food intake in Octopus briareus Robson. Journal of Comperative and Physiological Psychology, 75 (2):171-185.
  • Boucher-Rodoni, R., 1973. Nutrition, digestion et transfert énergétique chez les céphalopodes Eledone cirrhosa (Lamarck,) et Illex illecebrosus (Lesueur). Thèse Doctorat Biol. Université de Genevé, 96 pp.
  • Boucher-Rodoni, R., E. Boucaud-Camou, K. Mangold, 1987. Feeding and digestion. In Cephalopod Life Cycles, Vol. II: Comparative Reviews, ed. P.R. Boyle, pp. 85-108. London: Academic Pres.
  • Cagnetta, P., 2000. Preliminary observations on the productive responses of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris C.) reared free or individual nets. In Recent Advances in Mediterranean marine aquaculture finfish species diversification. Zaragoza: CHEAM-IAMZ., 47: 323-329.
  • Cagnetta, P., A. Sublimi, 2000. Productive performance of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris C.) when fed on a monodiet. In Recent Advances in Mediterranean Marine Aquaculture Finfish Species Diversification. Zaragoza: CHEAM-IAMZ.
  • Garcia Garcia B., F.A. Gimenez, 2002. Influence of diet on growing and nutrient utilization in the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Aquaculture, 211: 171-182.
  • Hanlon, R.T., J.B. Messenger. 1996. Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CB2 1 RP, United Kingdom, 230 pp.
  • Iglesias, J., F.J. Sanchez, J.J. Otero, C. Moxica, 2000. Culture of octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier): Present knowledge, problems and perspectives. In Recent Advances in Mediterranean Marine Aquaculture Finfish Species Diversification. Zaragoza: CHEAM-IAMZ, 47: 313-322.
  • Lee, P.G., 1994. Nutrition of cephalopods: fuelling the sysytem. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 25, 35-51.
  • Lefkaditou, E., A. Siapatis, C. Papaconstantinou, 1998. Seasonal and spatial changes in the abundance and distribution of Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopoda), in the South Aegean Sea (eastern Mediterranean). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, CM 1998/M: 44, 8 pp.
  • Mangold, K., 1983. Eledone moschata. In (P.R. Boyle ed.): Cephalopod life cycles. Academic Press, London 1:387-400.
  • Mangold-Wirz, K., 1963. Biologies de cephalopods bentiques et nectoniques de la Mer Catalane. Vie et Milieu, Suppl., 13: 12-85.
  • Mangold, K., R. Boucher-Rodoni 1973. Rôle de jeune dans l’induction de la maturation genitale chez les femelles d’Eledone cirrhosa (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris D 276: 2007-2010.
  • Mather, J.A., 1988. Daytime activity of juvenile Octopus vulgaris in Bermuda. Malacologia, 29: 69-76.
  • Mather, J.A., 1994. ‘Home’ choice and modification by juvenile Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): specialized intelligence and tool use. J. Zool. Lond. 233(3): 359-368.
  • Mather, J.A., R.K. O’Dor, 1991. Foraging strategies and predation risk shape the natural history of juvenile Octopus vulgaris. Bull. Mar. Sci., 49 (12): 256-269.
  • Nabhitabhata, J., 1995. The culture of cephalopods: commercial scale attempts in Thailand. In. Aquaculture towards the 21st century (K.P.P. Nambiar and T. Singh, eds). Published by INFOFISH, pp. 138-146.
  • Naef, A., 1928. Die Cephalopoden. Fauna Flora Golfo Napoli, 35. monogr., part I, vol. 2, 37 pl.(first publ. 1923), 357p.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, 1999. The abundance and distribution of Eledone cirrhosa (Lamarck, 1798) and Eledone moschata (Lamarck, 1799) (Cephalopoda:Octopoda) in Aegean Sea. (in Turkish). Doğa- Tr.J.Zool., Vol. 23 Ek Sayı 2: 675-701.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, A.C. Gücü, 2000. The distribution and fishing of the two Mediterranean Eledone spp. (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) in the Aegean Sea. Tr.J.Zool., 24: 165-171.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, H.A. Benli, 2002. Cephalopod fauna of the eastren Mediterranean. Turk. J. Zool., 26: 47-52.
  • Silva, L., F. Ramos, I. Sobrino, 2004. Reproductive biology of Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the Gulf of Cadiz (south- western Spain, ICES Division IXa). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 84 (6): 1221- 1226.
  • Sümbüloğlu, K., V. Sümbüloğlu, 2002. Biyoistatistik. Hatiboğlu Yayınları, Ankara, 269 sayfa.
  • Şen, H. Occupancy of PVC tube as a shelter in musky octopus (Eledone moschata Lamarck, 1799) (Cephalopoda: Octopodae). (in Turkish). Ege Univ. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. (in press).
  • Vaz-Pires, P., P. Seixas, A. Barbosa, 2004. Aquaculture potential of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797): a review. Aquaculture, 238(1-4): 221-238.
  • Vidal, E.A.G., F.P. DiMarco, J.H. Wormuth, P.G. Lee, 2002. Optimizing rearing conditions of hatchling loliginid squid. Mar. Biol. 140(1): 117-127.
  • Villanueva, R., 1995. Experimental rearing and growth of planktonic Octopus vulgaris from hatchling to settlement. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52 (12): 2639-2650.
  • Wells, M.J., R.K. O’Dor, K. Mangold, J. Wells, 1983. Feding and metabolic rate in Octopus. Mar. Behav. Physiol., 9: 305-317.

Mis Ahtapot (Eledone moschata Lamarck, 1799)'un Kontrollü Koşullara Adaptasyonunda Yuvanın Etkisi.

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 453 - 456, 01.09.2005

Halil Şen

Öz

Bu çalışmada, ahtapot yetiştiriciliğinde çok önemli bir konu olan yuvanın, doğadan yakalanan ergin E. moschata bireylerinin kontrollü koşullara adaptasyonu üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ahtapotlar üç gruba ayrılmıştır; Grup B (yuva materyali olarak beyaz PVC tüp kullanılmıştır), Grup S (yuva materyali olarak siyah PVC tüp kullanılmıştır) ve Grup K (kontrol grubu, yuva materyali kullanılmamıştır). Deneme süresince, doğal deniz suyu sıcaklığı (14.7±1.9°C) ve tuzluluğu (‰37) ile doğal fotoperiyot (38°21'N, 26°46'E) kullanılmış ve oksijen doygunluğu %80’nin üzerinde tutulmuştur. Bu çalışmada, ilk yem alımı (denemenin 2. günü) ve kontrollü koşullara adaptasyon (denemenin 5. günü) Grup K’da olmuştur. Grup B ve Grup S’de, ilk besin alımı, sırasıyla denemenin 4. ve 3. günü saptanmıştır. Grup B ve Grup S’de kontrollü koşullara adaptasyonun, sırasıyla denemenin 8. ve 9. günü tamamlandığı tespit edilmiştir. Deneme süresince, hiçbir grupta kanibalizm ve beslenme rekabeti gözlenmemiştir. İstatistiksel olarak gruplar arasında önemli bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0.05)

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eledone moschata adaptasyon yuva

Kaynakça

  • Akyol O., G. Metin, 2001. Investigations on species composition and catch per trawl of cephalopods caught by bottom trawl in the Bay of Izmir (Aegean Sea). (in Turkish). Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt, 2, 2: 381-385.
  • Anon, 2002. The State of The World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2002. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  • Baltazar, P., P. Rodriguez, W.R.V. Valdivieso, 2000. Cultivo experimantal de Octopus mimus Gould 1852 en el Peru. Rev. Peru. Biol., 7(2):151-160.
  • Boletzky, S.V., 1975. Le développment d’Eledone moschata (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) élevée au laboratoire. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 100: 361-367.
  • Boletzky, S.V., R.T. Hanlon, 1983. A review of the laboratory maintenance, rearing and culture of cephalopod molluscs. Memoirs of the Nationa. Museum of Victoria. Stone, D.M. ed. 44:147-187.
  • Borer K.T., 1971. Control of food intake in Octopus briareus Robson. Journal of Comperative and Physiological Psychology, 75 (2):171-185.
  • Boucher-Rodoni, R., 1973. Nutrition, digestion et transfert énergétique chez les céphalopodes Eledone cirrhosa (Lamarck,) et Illex illecebrosus (Lesueur). Thèse Doctorat Biol. Université de Genevé, 96 pp.
  • Boucher-Rodoni, R., E. Boucaud-Camou, K. Mangold, 1987. Feeding and digestion. In Cephalopod Life Cycles, Vol. II: Comparative Reviews, ed. P.R. Boyle, pp. 85-108. London: Academic Pres.
  • Cagnetta, P., 2000. Preliminary observations on the productive responses of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris C.) reared free or individual nets. In Recent Advances in Mediterranean marine aquaculture finfish species diversification. Zaragoza: CHEAM-IAMZ., 47: 323-329.
  • Cagnetta, P., A. Sublimi, 2000. Productive performance of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris C.) when fed on a monodiet. In Recent Advances in Mediterranean Marine Aquaculture Finfish Species Diversification. Zaragoza: CHEAM-IAMZ.
  • Garcia Garcia B., F.A. Gimenez, 2002. Influence of diet on growing and nutrient utilization in the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Aquaculture, 211: 171-182.
  • Hanlon, R.T., J.B. Messenger. 1996. Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CB2 1 RP, United Kingdom, 230 pp.
  • Iglesias, J., F.J. Sanchez, J.J. Otero, C. Moxica, 2000. Culture of octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier): Present knowledge, problems and perspectives. In Recent Advances in Mediterranean Marine Aquaculture Finfish Species Diversification. Zaragoza: CHEAM-IAMZ, 47: 313-322.
  • Lee, P.G., 1994. Nutrition of cephalopods: fuelling the sysytem. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 25, 35-51.
  • Lefkaditou, E., A. Siapatis, C. Papaconstantinou, 1998. Seasonal and spatial changes in the abundance and distribution of Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopoda), in the South Aegean Sea (eastern Mediterranean). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, CM 1998/M: 44, 8 pp.
  • Mangold, K., 1983. Eledone moschata. In (P.R. Boyle ed.): Cephalopod life cycles. Academic Press, London 1:387-400.
  • Mangold-Wirz, K., 1963. Biologies de cephalopods bentiques et nectoniques de la Mer Catalane. Vie et Milieu, Suppl., 13: 12-85.
  • Mangold, K., R. Boucher-Rodoni 1973. Rôle de jeune dans l’induction de la maturation genitale chez les femelles d’Eledone cirrhosa (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris D 276: 2007-2010.
  • Mather, J.A., 1988. Daytime activity of juvenile Octopus vulgaris in Bermuda. Malacologia, 29: 69-76.
  • Mather, J.A., 1994. ‘Home’ choice and modification by juvenile Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): specialized intelligence and tool use. J. Zool. Lond. 233(3): 359-368.
  • Mather, J.A., R.K. O’Dor, 1991. Foraging strategies and predation risk shape the natural history of juvenile Octopus vulgaris. Bull. Mar. Sci., 49 (12): 256-269.
  • Nabhitabhata, J., 1995. The culture of cephalopods: commercial scale attempts in Thailand. In. Aquaculture towards the 21st century (K.P.P. Nambiar and T. Singh, eds). Published by INFOFISH, pp. 138-146.
  • Naef, A., 1928. Die Cephalopoden. Fauna Flora Golfo Napoli, 35. monogr., part I, vol. 2, 37 pl.(first publ. 1923), 357p.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, 1999. The abundance and distribution of Eledone cirrhosa (Lamarck, 1798) and Eledone moschata (Lamarck, 1799) (Cephalopoda:Octopoda) in Aegean Sea. (in Turkish). Doğa- Tr.J.Zool., Vol. 23 Ek Sayı 2: 675-701.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, A.C. Gücü, 2000. The distribution and fishing of the two Mediterranean Eledone spp. (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) in the Aegean Sea. Tr.J.Zool., 24: 165-171.
  • Salman, A., T. Katağan, H.A. Benli, 2002. Cephalopod fauna of the eastren Mediterranean. Turk. J. Zool., 26: 47-52.
  • Silva, L., F. Ramos, I. Sobrino, 2004. Reproductive biology of Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the Gulf of Cadiz (south- western Spain, ICES Division IXa). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 84 (6): 1221- 1226.
  • Sümbüloğlu, K., V. Sümbüloğlu, 2002. Biyoistatistik. Hatiboğlu Yayınları, Ankara, 269 sayfa.
  • Şen, H. Occupancy of PVC tube as a shelter in musky octopus (Eledone moschata Lamarck, 1799) (Cephalopoda: Octopodae). (in Turkish). Ege Univ. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. (in press).
  • Vaz-Pires, P., P. Seixas, A. Barbosa, 2004. Aquaculture potential of the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797): a review. Aquaculture, 238(1-4): 221-238.
  • Vidal, E.A.G., F.P. DiMarco, J.H. Wormuth, P.G. Lee, 2002. Optimizing rearing conditions of hatchling loliginid squid. Mar. Biol. 140(1): 117-127.
  • Villanueva, R., 1995. Experimental rearing and growth of planktonic Octopus vulgaris from hatchling to settlement. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52 (12): 2639-2650.
  • Wells, M.J., R.K. O’Dor, K. Mangold, J. Wells, 1983. Feding and metabolic rate in Octopus. Mar. Behav. Physiol., 9: 305-317.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Halil Şen

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2005
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Aralık 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Şen, H. (2005). Mis Ahtapot (Eledone moschata Lamarck, 1799)’un Kontrollü Koşullara Adaptasyonunda Yuvanın Etkisi. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 22(3), 453-456.