CPUE comparison of traditional crayfish fyke net rigged with knotted net and alternatively knotless net

Dr. Mehmet Cilbiz; Rahmi Uysal; Abdulkadir Yağcı; Süleyman Oğuz Korkut; Kadir Çapkın; Mehmet Cesur

doi:10.12714/egejfas.38.1.09

TR EN

Düğümlü ağdan donanmış geleneksel kerevit pinteri ile alternatif olarak düğümsüz ağdan donanmış pinterlerin CPUE karşılaştırması

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de kerevit (Pontastacus leptodactylus, Eschscholtz, 1823) avcılığında kullanılmakta olan 210d/6 numara düğümlü ağdan donanmış geleneksel ağ materyali yerine, 210d//12 numara ip kalınlığındaki düğümsüz ağdan donanmış olan kerevit pinterinin verim ve mukavemetinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma Haziran 2017 ile Mayıs 2018 döneminde aylık olarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada 150 adet klasik, 150 adette alternatif ağdan donanmış olan toplam 300 adet pinter kullanılmıştır. Avlanan kerevitler, avlandıkları pinterlere göre ayrılmış ağırlık ve boy ölçümleri yapılmıştır. 1465’i alternatif pinter, 2044’ü de geleneksel pinter ile avlanmış toplam 3509 adet kerevit yakalanmıştır. Operasyon başına ortalama CPUE değeri 10.93 (g/pinter/gün) ile 281.14 (g/pinter/gün) arasında değişim göstermiştir. Geleneksel takımın ortalama CPUE değeri 98.34 (g/pinter/gün) bulunmuş iken alternatif takımınki ise 79.46 (g/pinter/gün) olarak bulunmuş olup; ortalama CPUE değerleri arasında istatistiki farklılık bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Geleneksel pinter ağının kopma direnci değeri ortalama (±SE) 10.43±0.27 kg; 210d/12 düğümsüz ağın ki ise 14.50±0.91 kg olarak belirlenmiştir (p<0.05). Her ne kadar yüksek mukavemete sahip olsa da alternatif pinterin CPUE’unun geleneksel takıma göre %19.20 oranında düşük olması nedeniyle, kerevit avcılığında kullanımının daha verimsiz olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supporting Institution

Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forest, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies

Project Number

TAGEM/HAYSUD/2017/A11/P-02/1

References

Ayaz, A., Acarli, D., Altinagac, U., Ozekinci, U., Kara, A. & Ozen, O. (2006). Ghost fishing by monofilament and multifilament gillnets in Izmir Bay, Turkey. Fisheries Research, 79(3), 267-271. DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.029
Balık, İ., Çubuk, H. & Uysal, R. (2003). Effect of Bait on Efficiency of Fyke-nets for Catching Crayfish Astacus leptodactylus Esch. 1823. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 3(1), 1-4.
Bevacqua, D., De Leo, G. A., Gatto, M. & Melià, P. (2009). Size selectivity of fyke nets for European eel Anguilla anguilla. Journal of Fish Biology, 74(9), 2178-2186. DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02243.x
Bolat, Y., Demirci, A. & Mazlum, Y. (2010). Size Selectivity of Traps (Fyke-Nets) of Different Mesh Size on The Narrow-Clawed Crayfish, Astacus leptodactylus (ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1823) (Decapoda, Astacidae) İn Eğirdir Lake, Turkey. Crustaceana, 8(11), 1349-1361. DOI:10.1163/001121610X536969
Bolat, Y. & Uçgun, E. (2019). Effects of Hexagonal-and Diamond-shaped Mesh Traps on Size Selectivity of Freshwater Crayfish Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823 (Decapoda: Astacidae) in the Eğirdir Lake, Turkey. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica.
Broadhurst, M. K., Butcher, P. A., Cullis, B. R. & Tolhurst, D. J. (2015). Influences of twine diameter and mesh area on the efficiency and durability of baited hoop nets targeting portunids. 22(6), 488-500. DOI:10.1111/fme.12146
Cilbiz, M. (2019). Improving Crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) Fyke Net Selectivity [in Turkish]. (PhD), Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 128p.
DSI (2005). Hirfanlı ve Kesikköprü Baraj Gölleri ve Havzalarında Kirlilik Araştırması. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (in Turkish).

FAO. (2016). GFCM Data Collection Reference Framework (DCRF) v.2016.2. Retrieved from Fische, J. R., Johnson, N. P., Schultz, R. D. & Quist, M. C. (2010). A Comparison of Modified Fyke Nets for Evaluating Fish Assemblages and Population Structure. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 25(4), 555-563. DOI:10.1080/02705060.2010.9664405
Fujimoto, Y., Hoshi, M. & Jinguji, H. (2017). Examination of an effective trap to control North American invasive freshwater crayfish (Procambarus clarkii） in Japan. Ecology and Civil Engineering, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3825/ece.20.1
Geldiay, R. & Kocataş, A. (1977). An investigation on the local population of the freshwater crabs (Potamon, Saving, 1816) in Turkey and a revision of its taxonomy. EÜ Fen Fak. Dergisi, Seri B, 1, 2.
Gençoğlu, L. & Ekmekçi, F.G. (2016). Growth and reproduction of a marine fish, Atherina boyeri (Risso 1810), in a freshwater ecosystem. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 40(4), 534-542.
Grati, F., Bolognini, L., Domenichetti, F., Fabi, G., Polidori, P., Santelli, A., Scarcella, G. & Spagnolo, A. (2015). The effect of monofilament thickness on the catches of gillnets for common sole in the Mediterranean small-scale fishery. Fisheries Research, 164, 170-177. DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.11.014
Green, N., Bentley, M., Stebbing, P., Andreou, D. & Britton, R. (2018). Trapping for invasive crayfish: comparisons of efficacy and selectivity of baited traps versus novel artificial refuge traps. Knowledge & Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (419). https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018007
Gülle, P., Tura, İ. & Gülle, İ. (2007). Egirdir Gölü Tatlısu Yengeci (Potamon potamios Olivier. 1804)'nin Bazı Üreme ve Popülasyon Özellikleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(2), 134-139.
Hamley, J.M. (1975). Review of gillnet selectivity. Journal of Fisheries. Board. Canada, 32, 1943-1969. DOI:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0401
Hardie, S.A., Barmuta, L.A. & White, R.W.G. (2005). Spawning related seasonal variation in fyke net catches of golden galaxias (Galaxias auratus): implications for monitoring lacustrine galaxiid populations. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 12(6), 407-409. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2005.00454.x
Jensen, J.W. (1995). A direct estimate of gillnet selectivity for brown trout. Journal of Fish Biology, 46(5), 857-861. DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb01608.x
Kim, S., Lim, J., Lee, K. & Park, S. (2016). Effect of twine thickness on size-selectivity of driftnet for the yellow croaker Larimichthys polyactis in southwestern Sea of Korea. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 34(6), 1199-1208. DOI:10.1007/s00343-016-5107-0
Königson, S., Hemmingsson, M., Lunneryd, S.-G. & Lundström, K. (2007). Seals and fyke nets: An investigation of the problem and its possible solution. Marine Biology Research, 3(1), 29-36. DOI:10.1080/17451000601072596
Kraft, C. E. & Johnson, B. L. (1992). Fyke-Net and Gill-Net Size Selectivities for Yellow Perch in Green Bay, Lake Michigan. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12(1), 230-236. DOI:10.1577/1548-8675(1992)012<0230:FNAGNS>2.3.CO;2
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T.J., Sumaila, U.R., Walters, C.J.,watson, R. & Zeller, D. (2002). Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature, 418(8), 689-695.
RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.
Smith, B.J., Blackwell, B.G., Wuellner, M.R., Graeb, B.D.S. & Willis, D.W. (2016). Escapement of Fishes from Modified Fyke Nets with Differing Throat Configurations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 36(1), 96-103. DOI:10.1080/02755947.2015.1111278
Smith, B.J. & Simpkins, D.G. (2017). A Comparison of Three Paired Modified Fyke Nets for Characterizing Fish Assemblages in the Nearshore Zone of Lake Michigan. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 37(5), 962-969. DOI:10.1080/02755947.2017.1336134
Tokaç, A. (2011). Ağ Yapım ve Donam Tekniği (Balıkçılık II), Yayın No:80: Ege Üniversitesi Basım Evi, Bornova-İzmir.
Tosunoğlu, Z., Ünal, V. & Kaykaç, M.H. (2017). Ege Dalyanları. SÜR-KOOP Su Ürünleri Kooperatifleri Merkez Birliği Yayınları No: 03, Ankara, 322p.
Tsai, C.H., Wang, Y.K., Tsai, S.T. & Wu, S.H. (2015). Seasonal and diel changes of the fish assemblage employing the fyke nets in a subtropical mangrove estuary of puzih river, Taiwan. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23(1), 109-116. DOI:10.6119/JMST-014-0110-3
Turunen, T. (1996). The effects of twine thickness on the catchability of gillnets for pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 33(3/4), 621-625. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/23736107
Ulikowski, D., Chybowski, Ł., Traczuk, P., Ulikowska, E.J.T.J.o.F. & Sciences, A. (2017). A New Design of Crayfish Traps Reduces Escaping and Improves Opportunities for Long-Term Catching. 17(2), 363-369.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Fisheries Management

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Dr. Mehmet Cilbiz ^*
0000-0002-7686-7570
Türkiye

Rahmi Uysal
0000-0002-7342-9380
Türkiye

Abdulkadir Yağcı
0000-0002-7897-1734
Türkiye

Süleyman Oğuz Korkut
0000-0002-6576-3557
Türkiye

Kadir Çapkın
0000-0002-6822-6896
Türkiye

Mehmet Cesur
0000-0002-7482-6353
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 15, 2021

Submission Date

March 13, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 26, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 38 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.38.1.09

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA53WP28PY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Cilbiz, D. M., Uysal, R., Yağcı, A., Korkut, S. O., Çapkın, K., & Cesur, M. (2021). CPUE comparison of traditional crayfish fyke net rigged with knotted net and alternatively knotless net. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.38.1.09

Cited By

Bycatch estimation of narrow‐clawed crayfish ( Pontastacus leptodactylus ) in Turkish fyke net fisheries

Fisheries Management and Ecology

https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12610

Effect of Different Baits on Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) for Catching Narrow-Clawed Crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus) with Fyke-Nets and Traps in Çanakkale Atikhisar Reservoir

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries

https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.1092067

Sorting grid usage to reduce the catch of undersized narrow‐clawed crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) in fyke net fisheries

Fisheries Management and Ecology

https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12731

Ghost fishing from fishermen’s perspective: A case from Turkish inland fisheries

Acta Aquatica Turcica

https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.1685905

CPUE comparison of traditional crayfish fyke net rigged with knotted net and alternatively knotless net

Düğümlü ağdan donanmış geleneksel kerevit pinteri ile alternatif olarak düğümsüz ağdan donanmış pinterlerin CPUE karşılaştırması

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler