Research Article

Setlining for European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax, Linnaeus, 1758); Technical features and bait preference

Volume: 30 Number: 2 June 1, 2013
  • Ozan Soykan
  • Hasan Tuncay Kınacıgil
EN TR

Setlining for European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax, Linnaeus, 1758); Technical features and bait preference

Abstract

This study was conducted between June and September of 2008 to determine the technical characteristics of setlining for European seabass in the central Aegean Sea, Çeşme. Experiments were carried out by 4 different baits; Annular sea bream (Diplodus annularis) and flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) were used as the live baits while picarel (Spicara sp.) and elegant cuttlefish (Sepia elegans) were used as the dead baits. During the study it was observed that 19% of the tackles captured European seabass, 9% of them captured by-catch species and 27% of those were detached. Finally 45% of the tackles didn’t catch any individuals. Among the weight based distribution of captured species European seabass composed the majority with 79%. On the other hand it was found that 70% of the European seabasses were captured with flathead grey mullet as being the most efficient bait for European seabass setlining in the central Aegean Sea.

Keywords

References

  1. Akyol, A., Ceyhan, T., Ertosluk, O., 2009. Coastal fisheries and fishing resources of Marmara Island (in Turkish with English abstract), Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 26(2): 143-148.
  2. Anonymous, 2012. Fisheries regulation for marine and fresh waters for commercial fishery, 2008-2012 fishing period No: 2/1, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair of Turkey, Protect and Control General Office, Ankara, p. 85. (in Turkish).
  3. Aydın, İ., 2011. Is natural bait type a stochastic process for size and condition of fishes in the recreational fishery of İzmir Bay?, Mediterranean Marine Science, 12(2): 390-400. doi:10.12681/mms.39
  4. Ceyhan, T., Akyol, O., 2005. The hand lines, used in bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix L., 1766) fishery in Marmara Region (in Turkish with English abstract), Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 22(3-4): 351- 355
  5. Dillon B., 2004. A bio-economic review of recreational angling for Bass (Dicentrachus labrax). Scarborough Centre for Coastal Studies, University of Hull.
  6. Eaton, D.R., 1996. The identification and Separation of wild caught and cultivated sea bass (Dicentrarchurus labrax). Fisheries Research Technical Report no. 103, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Lowestoft.p.5.
  7. EAA (European Anglers Alliance), 2003. Press Release form the European Anglers Alliance (n.d), Europe’s 25 million anglers demand equal rights to commercial fishermen. Retrieved June 15 2012 from http://www.eaa- europe.org/fileadmin/templates/eaa/docs/EAA_News_Jan_2003_EN %20Correct.pdf
  8. FAO,2010.http://www.fao.org/figis/servlet/SQServlet?file=/usr/local/tomcat/FI/ 5.5.23/figis/webapps/figis/temp/hqp_6014.xml&outtype=html.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ozan Soykan

Hasan Tuncay Kınacıgil

Publication Date

June 1, 2013

Submission Date

December 7, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 30 Number: 2

APA
Soykan, O., & Kınacıgil, H. T. (2013). Setlining for European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax, Linnaeus, 1758); Technical features and bait preference. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 30(2), 45-49. https://izlik.org/JA35ZK63JK