Research Article

Economic growth and fisheries biocapacity in BRICS+T: An Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis

Volume: 42 Number: 2 June 15, 2025
EN TR

Economic growth and fisheries biocapacity in BRICS+T: An Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis

Abstract

This study evaluates the robustness of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by examining the association between economic growth and fisheries biocapacity in BRICS+T countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Türkiye. Panel bootstrap causality test is utilized to evaluate the causal relationship between the variables using data covering the period 1992-2022. The results show that the EKC hypothesis is held for Russia, South Africa and Türkiye and that economic growth initially causes to a decrease in fisheries biocapacity, but after a certain threshold, biocapacity recovers. In contrast, the EKC hypothesis is not supported for Brazil, China and India. These findings necessitate governments to take policy measures to promote environmental sustainability.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval is not required for this study.

References

  1. Abid, M. (2017). Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? a comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.007
  2. Alam, R., & Adil, M.H. (2019). Validating the environmental Kuznets curve in India: ARDL bounds testing framework. OPEC Energy Review, 43(3), 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12156
  3. Allard, A., Takman, J., Uddin, G.S., & Ahmed, A. (2018). The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(6), 5848-5861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0907-0
  4. Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2015). The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and political stability on environmental degradation in the MENA region. Energy, 84, 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004
  5. Amin, S., Li, C., Khan, Y. A., & Bibi, A. (2022). Fishing grounds footprint and economic freedom indexes: evidence from Asia-Pacific. PLoS One, 17(4), e0263872. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263872
  6. Awosusi, A. A., Kutlay, K., Altuntaş, M., Khodjiev, B., Agyekum, E. B., Shouran, M., & Kamel, S. (2022). A roadmap toward achieving a sustainable environment: Evaluating the impact of technological innovation and globalization on the load capacity factor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063288
  7. Ayad, H. (2023). Investigating the fishing grounds load capacity curve in G7 nations: Evaluating the influence of human capital and renewable energy use. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 194, 115413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115413
  8. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Álvarez-Herranz, A., & Shahbaz, M. (2019). The long-term effect of economic growth, energy innovation, and energy use on environmental quality. In: Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre, D. (Eds.) Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_1

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Conservation and Biodiversity , Fisheries Management

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

June 14, 2025

Publication Date

June 15, 2025

Submission Date

October 18, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 5, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 42 Number: 2

APA
Canbay, Ş., & Şengül, S. (2025). Economic growth and fisheries biocapacity in BRICS+T: An Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.2.02