Valuation of recreational fishing benefits: A snapshot from Ordu, Turkey.

Cilt: 30 Sayı: 4 1 Aralık 2013
  • Mehmet Aydın
  • Sezgin Tunca
  • Uğur Karadurmuş
  • Denizcan Durgun
PDF İndir
EN TR

Rekreasyonel balıkçılığın faydalarının değerlemesi: Ordu örneği.

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Anonymous, 2012. No: 3/2 Notification of regulations on marine and inland recreational fisheries in Turkey (in Turkish). Notification Number: 2012/66. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ankara.
  2. Bateman, I., Willis, K.G., 2002. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN-10: 0199248915, 692 p.
  3. Bilgic, A., Florkowski, W.J., 2007. Application of a hurdle negative binomial count data model to demand for bass fishing in the southeastern United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 83: 478-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.009
  4. Cantrell, R.N., Garcia, M., Leung, P., Ziemann, D., 2004. Recreational anglers’ willingness to pay for increased catch rates of PaciŞc threadŞn (Polydactylus sexŞlis) in Hawaii. Fisheries Research. 68: 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.01.003
  5. Creel, M.D., Loomis, J.B., 1990.
  6. Theoretical and empirical advantages of
  7. truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California.
  8. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2): 434-441.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Mehmet Aydın

Sezgin Tunca

Uğur Karadurmuş

Denizcan Durgun

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Aralık 2015

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aydın, M., Tunca, S., Karadurmuş, U., & Durgun, D. (2013). Valuation of recreational fishing benefits: A snapshot from Ordu, Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 30(4), 147-154. https://izlik.org/JA58AG48TS