Short Communication
BibTex RIS Cite

Length-weight relationships of fishes caught by stationary uncovered pound nets in the coastal waters of Saros Bay, North Aegean Sea (Turkey)

Year 2021, Volume: 38 Issue: 1, 95 - 99, 15.03.2021

Serhat Çolakoğlu

https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.38.1.11

Abstract


Stationary uncovered pound nets are passively fishing gears used for fish catching according to traditional methods in the coastal waters of Saros Bay, North Aegean Sea. The purpose of this study was to determine length-weight relations (LWRs) for a wide range of fish species collected from the traps in the coastal waters of Saros Bay. We are studied in the fish species caught by four traps between April and August (fishing season) in 2010 - 2012. A total of 23 fish species belonging to 12 families were caught individual 2.096. The mean value of the growth pattern (b) was 3.141±0.042, ranging from 2.711 to 3.577. Whereas they were negative allometric only for two species (Pomatomus saltatrix and Mugil cephalus), from other fish species were observed to be 13 positive allometric and 8 isometrics. The LWR parameters for the positive allometric and isometric fish species were significant (P<0.05). This study provides some general information about the status of the LWR parameters of the fish species caught from the traps.

Keywords

Length - weight relationship fish species fixed stake trap Saros Bay stationary uncovered pound net

References

  • Akyol, O., Kinacigil, H.T. & Sevik, R. (2007). Longline fishery and length-weight relationships for selected fish species in Gokova Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey). International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 1, 1-4.
  • Biçer, D., Yıldız, T., Uzer, U., Karakulak, F.S. (2020). Last dalians (stationary uncovered pound nets) deployed in the İstanbul Strait: Catch composition, catch per unit effort, and ecological indexes. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37(2), 125-133.
  • Bok, T.D., Gokturk, D., Kahraman, A.E., Alıclı, T.Z., Acun, T. & Ateş, C. (2011). Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10 (23): 3037-3042. DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2011.3037.3042
  • Cengiz, Ö. (2013). Length–weight relationships of 22 fish species from the Gallipoli Peninsula and Dardanelles (northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 37: 419-422. DOİ:10.3906/zoo-1209-30
  • Ceyhan, T., Akyol, O. & Erdem, M. (2009). Length-weight re¬lationships of fishes from Gokova Bay, Turkey (Aegean Sea). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 33: 69-72.
  • Çolakoğlu, S., Tokaç, A., İşmen, A. & Yurdusev, H. (2015). Catch composition of set net (fixed stake trap) fisheries in the coastal waters of Saros Bay, North Aegean Sea. Ege Journal of Fisheries Aquatic Science 32(2): 53-58. DOI: 10.12714/egejfas.2015.32.2.02
  • Demirhan, S.A. & Can, M.F. (2007). Length-weight relationships for seven fish species from the southeastern Black Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23: 282-283. DOI:10.1111/j.14390426.2007.00835.x
  • Deveciyan, K. (2011). Türkiye’de Balık ve Balıkçılık. Aras Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2011.
  • Erguden, D., Turan, C. & Gurlek, M. (2009). Weight-length rela¬tionships for 20 lessepsian fish species caught by bottom trawl on the coast of Iskenderun Bay (NE Mediterranean Sea, Turkey). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25: 133-135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01198.x
  • Filiz, H. & Bilge, B. (2004). Length–weight relationships of 24 fish species from the North Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 20: 431-432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00582.x
  • Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x
  • Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (2013). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org (10/2013).
  • Gonçalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Lino, P.G., Ribeiro, J., Canário, A.V.M. & Erzini, K. (1997). Weight–length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the South and southwest coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research, 30, 253–256.
  • Ilkyaz, T., Metin, G., Soykan, O. & Kinacigil, H.T. (2008). Length–weight relationship of 62 fish species from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyol¬ogy, 24, 699-702. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01167.x
  • Ismen, A., Ozen, O., Altinagac, U., Ozekinci, U. & Ayaz, A. (2007). Weight–length relationships of 63 fish species in Saros Bay, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 707-708. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00872.x
  • Jobling, M. (2002). Environmental factors and rates of development and growth. In: Handbook of fish biology and fisheries (P.J.B. Hart & J.D. Reynolds eds). Pp. 97-122. Blackwell Science Ltd: Oxford, USA.
  • Karakulak, F.S., Erk, H. & Bilgin, B. (2006). Length–weight re¬lationships for 47 coastal fish species from the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22, 274-278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00736.x
  • Kasapoglu, N. & Duzgunes, E. (2014). Length-weight relationships of marine species caught by five gears from the Black Sea. Mediterranean Marine Science, 15, 95-100. DOI:10.12681/mms.463
  • Keskin, C. & Gaygusuz, O. (2010). Length-weight relationships of fishes in shallow waters of Erdek Bay (Sea of Marmara, Turkey). IUFS Journal of Biology, 69 (1), 25-32.
  • Mater, S., Kaya, M. & Bilecenoğlu, M. (2003). Türkiye Deniz Balıkları Atlası (III. Baskı), Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınları, No. 68, İzmir (In Turkish),169p.
  • Moutopoulos, D.K. & Stergiou, K.I. (2002). Length–weight and length–length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18, 200–203. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x
  • Ozaydin, O. & Taskavak, E. (2006). Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriatica, 47, 211-216.
  • Ozaydin, O., Uckun, D., Akalin, S., Leblebici, S. & Tosunoglu, Z. (2007). Length–weight relationships of fishes captured from Izmir Bay, Central Aegean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 695-696. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00853.x
  • Ricker, W.E. (1973). Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30, 409-434.
  • Sangun, L., Akamca, E. & Akar, M. (2007). Weight-length rela¬tionships for 39 fish species from the north-eastern Medi¬terranean coast of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 7, 37-40.
  • Silva, J.F., Ellis, J.R. & Ayers, R.A. (2013). Length-weight relationships of marine fish collected from around the British Isles. Science Series Technical Report n°150. Cefas: Lowestoft. 109 pp.
  • StatSoft, Inc. (2007). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0.
  • Taskavak, E. & Bilecenoglu, M. (2001). Length-weight relation¬ships for 18 lessepsian (Red Sea) immigrant fish species from the eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 895-896. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315401004805
  • Wootton, R.J. (1990). Ecology of Teleost Fish. Chapman and Hall, London. 404p.
  • Yankova, M., Pavlov, D., Raykov, V., Michneva, V. & Radu, G. (2011). Length-Weight Relationships of Ten Fish Species from the Bulgarian Black Sea waters. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 35, 265-270.
  • Yıldız, T., Zengin, M., Uzer, U., Akpınar, İ.Ö. & Karakulak, F.S. (2018). Length-weight relationships for 24 fish species collected from the western Black Sea (Turkey). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 59,159-165. DOI: 10.21411/CBM.A.39436D05
  • Zar, J.H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. 4thedition. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 929 pp.

Saros Körfezi’nin (Kuzey Ege Denizi) kıyısal sularında ağ dalyan ile yakalanan balıkların boy-ağırlık ilişkileri

Year 2021, Volume: 38 Issue: 1, 95 - 99, 15.03.2021

Serhat Çolakoğlu

https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.38.1.11

Abstract


Ağ dalyanlar, Kuzey Ege Denizi'nin Saros Körfezi kıyılarında geleneksel yöntemlere göre balık avlamada kullanılan pasif av araçlarıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Saros Körfezi kıyılarındaki ağ dalyanlardan toplanan çeşitli balık türleri için boy-ağırlık ilişkilerini (LWRs) belirlemektir. 2010 - 2012 yıllarında Nisan ve Ağustos ayları arasında (balık avlama sezonu) dört ağ dalyandan yakalanan balık türlerinde çalışılmıştır. 12 aileye ait toplam 23 balık türünde toplam 2.096 adet birey yakalandı. Büyüme ilişkilerinin (b) ortalama değeri 3.141 ± 0.042 iken, 2.711 - 3.577 arasında değişmiştir. Sadece iki tür (Pomatomus saltatrix ve Mugil cephalus) negatif allometrik iken, diğer balık türlerinden 13 pozitif allometrik ve 8 izometrik olduğu tespit edilmiştir. LWR parametreleri pozitif allometrik ve izometrik balık türleri için anlamlıydı (P <0.05). Bu çalışma, ağ dalyanlardan yakalanan balık türlerinin LWR parametreleri ile ilgili bazı genel bilgiler sunmaktadır.



Keywords

Boy-ağırlık ilişkileri balık türleri ağ dalyan Saros Körfezi

References

  • Akyol, O., Kinacigil, H.T. & Sevik, R. (2007). Longline fishery and length-weight relationships for selected fish species in Gokova Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey). International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 1, 1-4.
  • Biçer, D., Yıldız, T., Uzer, U., Karakulak, F.S. (2020). Last dalians (stationary uncovered pound nets) deployed in the İstanbul Strait: Catch composition, catch per unit effort, and ecological indexes. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37(2), 125-133.
  • Bok, T.D., Gokturk, D., Kahraman, A.E., Alıclı, T.Z., Acun, T. & Ateş, C. (2011). Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10 (23): 3037-3042. DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2011.3037.3042
  • Cengiz, Ö. (2013). Length–weight relationships of 22 fish species from the Gallipoli Peninsula and Dardanelles (northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 37: 419-422. DOİ:10.3906/zoo-1209-30
  • Ceyhan, T., Akyol, O. & Erdem, M. (2009). Length-weight re¬lationships of fishes from Gokova Bay, Turkey (Aegean Sea). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 33: 69-72.
  • Çolakoğlu, S., Tokaç, A., İşmen, A. & Yurdusev, H. (2015). Catch composition of set net (fixed stake trap) fisheries in the coastal waters of Saros Bay, North Aegean Sea. Ege Journal of Fisheries Aquatic Science 32(2): 53-58. DOI: 10.12714/egejfas.2015.32.2.02
  • Demirhan, S.A. & Can, M.F. (2007). Length-weight relationships for seven fish species from the southeastern Black Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23: 282-283. DOI:10.1111/j.14390426.2007.00835.x
  • Deveciyan, K. (2011). Türkiye’de Balık ve Balıkçılık. Aras Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2011.
  • Erguden, D., Turan, C. & Gurlek, M. (2009). Weight-length rela¬tionships for 20 lessepsian fish species caught by bottom trawl on the coast of Iskenderun Bay (NE Mediterranean Sea, Turkey). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25: 133-135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01198.x
  • Filiz, H. & Bilge, B. (2004). Length–weight relationships of 24 fish species from the North Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 20: 431-432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00582.x
  • Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x
  • Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (2013). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org (10/2013).
  • Gonçalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Lino, P.G., Ribeiro, J., Canário, A.V.M. & Erzini, K. (1997). Weight–length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the South and southwest coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research, 30, 253–256.
  • Ilkyaz, T., Metin, G., Soykan, O. & Kinacigil, H.T. (2008). Length–weight relationship of 62 fish species from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyol¬ogy, 24, 699-702. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01167.x
  • Ismen, A., Ozen, O., Altinagac, U., Ozekinci, U. & Ayaz, A. (2007). Weight–length relationships of 63 fish species in Saros Bay, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 707-708. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00872.x
  • Jobling, M. (2002). Environmental factors and rates of development and growth. In: Handbook of fish biology and fisheries (P.J.B. Hart & J.D. Reynolds eds). Pp. 97-122. Blackwell Science Ltd: Oxford, USA.
  • Karakulak, F.S., Erk, H. & Bilgin, B. (2006). Length–weight re¬lationships for 47 coastal fish species from the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22, 274-278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00736.x
  • Kasapoglu, N. & Duzgunes, E. (2014). Length-weight relationships of marine species caught by five gears from the Black Sea. Mediterranean Marine Science, 15, 95-100. DOI:10.12681/mms.463
  • Keskin, C. & Gaygusuz, O. (2010). Length-weight relationships of fishes in shallow waters of Erdek Bay (Sea of Marmara, Turkey). IUFS Journal of Biology, 69 (1), 25-32.
  • Mater, S., Kaya, M. & Bilecenoğlu, M. (2003). Türkiye Deniz Balıkları Atlası (III. Baskı), Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınları, No. 68, İzmir (In Turkish),169p.
  • Moutopoulos, D.K. & Stergiou, K.I. (2002). Length–weight and length–length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18, 200–203. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x
  • Ozaydin, O. & Taskavak, E. (2006). Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriatica, 47, 211-216.
  • Ozaydin, O., Uckun, D., Akalin, S., Leblebici, S. & Tosunoglu, Z. (2007). Length–weight relationships of fishes captured from Izmir Bay, Central Aegean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 695-696. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00853.x
  • Ricker, W.E. (1973). Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30, 409-434.
  • Sangun, L., Akamca, E. & Akar, M. (2007). Weight-length rela¬tionships for 39 fish species from the north-eastern Medi¬terranean coast of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 7, 37-40.
  • Silva, J.F., Ellis, J.R. & Ayers, R.A. (2013). Length-weight relationships of marine fish collected from around the British Isles. Science Series Technical Report n°150. Cefas: Lowestoft. 109 pp.
  • StatSoft, Inc. (2007). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0.
  • Taskavak, E. & Bilecenoglu, M. (2001). Length-weight relation¬ships for 18 lessepsian (Red Sea) immigrant fish species from the eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 895-896. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315401004805
  • Wootton, R.J. (1990). Ecology of Teleost Fish. Chapman and Hall, London. 404p.
  • Yankova, M., Pavlov, D., Raykov, V., Michneva, V. & Radu, G. (2011). Length-Weight Relationships of Ten Fish Species from the Bulgarian Black Sea waters. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 35, 265-270.
  • Yıldız, T., Zengin, M., Uzer, U., Akpınar, İ.Ö. & Karakulak, F.S. (2018). Length-weight relationships for 24 fish species collected from the western Black Sea (Turkey). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 59,159-165. DOI: 10.21411/CBM.A.39436D05
  • Zar, J.H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. 4thedition. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 929 pp.
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Fisheries Management
Journal Section Short Communications
Authors

Serhat Çolakoğlu 0000-0003-3526-6477

Publication Date March 15, 2021
Submission Date January 14, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021Volume: 38 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çolakoğlu, S. (2021). Length-weight relationships of fishes caught by stationary uncovered pound nets in the coastal waters of Saros Bay, North Aegean Sea (Turkey). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38(1), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.38.1.11