Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 7 - 14, 30.06.2020

Fahri Saka Musa Bulut

https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.658093
Cited By: 4

Öz

Fish plays a key role in human consumption in terms of protein,
mineral, and essential fatty acid contents. Unfortunately, despite its
importance for the human health, there is lack interest on the fish consumption
in Turkey. In this context, this paper aimed to determine the fish consumption
habits in Çanakkale. It is estimated that fish consumption could be higher in
the locations along the coasts of marine and inland waters. Therefore,
consumers living in all districts of the city were surveyed to test this
hypothesis. The questionnaire was carried out to provide an insight into the
fish consumption habits of randomly selected 1056 consumers in Çanakkale.
Socio-economic and demographic structures such as age, gender, educational
status, profession, income level of the consumers were determined. Responses of
the consumers were arranged and analysed by using SPSS and MS-Excel software.
Moreover, fish consumption amount, consumption frequency, preferred fish
species, most consumed fish species were also determined. The results give an
excellent snapshot of fish consumption habits in Çanakkale. Both the most
consumed and the most favourite fish species are identified as Sarda sarda.
Fish consumption frequency was described as 33.3% (352 individuals) for consuming
fish one a week followed by bimonthly frequency (21.9%, 231 individuals) and
monthly frequency (21.5%, 227 individuals). 2.3% (24 individuals) of the
participants noted that they never consume fish. Moreover, the majority of
consumers specified that they consume fish 1-2 kg (39.0%, 312 individuals) and
27.3% (288 individuals) consume fish 0.5-1 kg. Socio-economic and demographic
characteristics of consumers are affecting the fish consumption habits. In the
present study, season, income level, and freshness of fish are found to be
driving force for fish consumption in Çanakkale. Therefore, fish farmers and
sellers are recommended to remain the freshness of fish and to follow the
appropriate fishing season for providing fish to consumers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fish consumption Consumption habits Socio-economic structure Demographic characteristics Questionnaire

Teşekkür

This paper includes a part of M.Sc. thesis of Fahri Saka. Authors would also like to thank Semih Kale for his contributions and supports during the study.

Kaynakça

  • Abdikoğlu, D. I. & Unakitan, G. (2019). Determining Important Factors on Fish Consumption With Conjoint Analysis in Tekirdag, Turkey. FOODBALT 2019 - 13th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology “Food. Nutrition. Well-Being” Conference Proceedings, 83-87. http://doi.org/10.22616/FoodBalt.2019.003
  • Akpınar, M. G., Dağıstan, E., Mazlum, Y., Gül, M., Koç, B. & Yılmaz, Y. (2009). Determining household preferences for fish consumption with conjoint analysis in Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(11): 2215-2222.
  • Arık Çolakoğlu, F., İşmen, A., Özen, Ö., Çakır, F., Yığın, Ç. & Ormancı, H. B. (2006). The evaluation of fish consumption in Çanakkale. Ege University Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 23(Ek 1/3): 387-392.
  • Arslan, G. (2019). Determination of fish consuming habits of vocational school students from different families. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 8(2): 40–45. https://doi.org/0.33714/masteb.622072
  • Aydın, M. &Karadurmuş, U. (2012). Consumer behaviours for seafood in Ordu province. Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, 3: 18-23. https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2012i21908.235434
  • Aydın, M. & Karadurmuş, U. (2013). Consumer behaviors for seafood in Giresun and Trabzon Province. The Black Sea Journal of Sciences, 3(9):57-71.
  • Aydın, M. & Odabaşı, Y. (2017). A study on the seafood consumer behaviors: Case of Diyarbakır Province. Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, 3(2): 101-112
  • Bashimov, G. (2017). Determınıng fish meat consumption habits in Nigde Province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 4(2): 196-204.
  • Bayraktar, S., Ergün, S. & Ayvaz, Z. (2019). Comparison of seafood consumption preferences and habits in Ankara and Çanakkale (Turkey). Acta Aquatica Turcica, 15(2): 213-226. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.489281
  • Boughanmi, H., Al-Musalami, J., Al-Oufi, H. & Zaibet, L. (2007). Estimating consumer preferences for value-added fish products in Oman. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 13(2): 47-68.
  • Can, M. F., Günlü, A. & Can, H. Y. (2015). Fish consumption preferences and factors influencing it. Food Science and Technology, 35(2): 339-346. http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.6624
  • Cengiz, D. & Özoğul, F. (2019). The survey study of seafood consumption in Adana and Mersin cities. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 37(1): 159-168.
  • Claret, A., Guerrero, L., Aguirre, E., Rincon, L., Hernandez, M. D., Martinez, I., Benito Peleteiro, J., Grau, A., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, C. (2012) Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: Exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2): 259-266.
  • Collins, M. (1986). Sampling. p. (85-110). In: Worcester, R.M., Donwham, J. (eds.), Consumer Market Research Handbook. McGraw-Hill Press, London. 840p.
  • Dal, B., Kızılaslan, H. & Dal, T. (2019). Fish consumption preferences of consumers and determination of criteria affecting fish consumption by analytical hierarchical process (AHS) method (Tokat Province of Almus District). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(10): 1526-1532. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i10.1526-1532.2479
  • Dilek, S., Paruğ, Ş., Paruğ, A. & Kesgingöz, H. (2019). Seafood Consumption Preferences and Fish Demand in Kastamonu. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(11): 1844-1857. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1844-1857.2751
  • FAO. & WHO. (2011). Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption, Rome, 25–29 January 2010. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 978. Rome.
  • FAO. (2018). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome. 210p.
  • GDFA. (2019). Fisheries Statistics. General Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Retrieved on November 14, 2019 from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/BSGM.pdf
  • Geslani, C., Loke, M. K., Barnes-Mauthe, M. & Leung, P. (2015) Seafood purchasing preferences of Hawaii Chefs: Comparing actual purchase to stated preferences from conjoint choice experiment. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 27(1): 50-63.
  • Hanis, A., Jinap, S., Mad Nasir, S. & Alias, R. (2013) Eliciting Malaysian consumer preferences for marine fish attributes by using conjoint analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(12): 2054-2060.
  • Kale, S. (2017a). Climatic trends in the temperature of Çanakkale city, Turkey. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 2(3): 14-27. https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.348449
  • Kale, S. (2017b). Analysis of climatic trends in evaporation for Çanakkale (Turkey). Middle East Journal of Science, 3(2): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.23884/mejs.2017.3.2.01
  • Kızılaslan, H. & Nalinci, S. (2013). The fish meat consumption habits of households and the factors affecting their fish meat consumption in the province of Amasya. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, 5: 61-75.
  • Lee, M-K. & Nam, J. (2019). The determinants of live fish consumption frequency in South Korea. Food Research International, 120: 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.005
  • Özer, O. O., Gül Yavuz, G. & Gül, U. (2016). Demographic factors influencing consumer preferences of seafood consumption: Central Anatolia Region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 4(5): 356-364.
  • Selvi, K., Kandemir, G. & Özdikmenli Tepeli, S. (2019). Determination of factors affecting on the fish consumption habit in rural areas: The case of Çan (Çanakkale). COMU Journal of Marine Science and Fisheries, 2(2): 132-141.
  • TurkStat. (2019) Statistics for Fishery Products in 2018. Turkish Statistical Institue Press Release, No: 30697. Retrieved on August 3, 2019 from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30697#
  • Ünal, V., Acarli, D. & Gordoa, A. (2010). Characteristics of marine recreational fishing in the Çanakkale Strait (Turkey). Mediterranean Marine Science, 11(2): 315-330. http://doi.org/10.12681/mms.79

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 7 - 14, 30.06.2020

Fahri Saka Musa Bulut

https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.658093
Cited By: 4

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdikoğlu, D. I. & Unakitan, G. (2019). Determining Important Factors on Fish Consumption With Conjoint Analysis in Tekirdag, Turkey. FOODBALT 2019 - 13th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology “Food. Nutrition. Well-Being” Conference Proceedings, 83-87. http://doi.org/10.22616/FoodBalt.2019.003
  • Akpınar, M. G., Dağıstan, E., Mazlum, Y., Gül, M., Koç, B. & Yılmaz, Y. (2009). Determining household preferences for fish consumption with conjoint analysis in Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(11): 2215-2222.
  • Arık Çolakoğlu, F., İşmen, A., Özen, Ö., Çakır, F., Yığın, Ç. & Ormancı, H. B. (2006). The evaluation of fish consumption in Çanakkale. Ege University Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 23(Ek 1/3): 387-392.
  • Arslan, G. (2019). Determination of fish consuming habits of vocational school students from different families. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 8(2): 40–45. https://doi.org/0.33714/masteb.622072
  • Aydın, M. &Karadurmuş, U. (2012). Consumer behaviours for seafood in Ordu province. Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, 3: 18-23. https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2012i21908.235434
  • Aydın, M. & Karadurmuş, U. (2013). Consumer behaviors for seafood in Giresun and Trabzon Province. The Black Sea Journal of Sciences, 3(9):57-71.
  • Aydın, M. & Odabaşı, Y. (2017). A study on the seafood consumer behaviors: Case of Diyarbakır Province. Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, 3(2): 101-112
  • Bashimov, G. (2017). Determınıng fish meat consumption habits in Nigde Province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 4(2): 196-204.
  • Bayraktar, S., Ergün, S. & Ayvaz, Z. (2019). Comparison of seafood consumption preferences and habits in Ankara and Çanakkale (Turkey). Acta Aquatica Turcica, 15(2): 213-226. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.489281
  • Boughanmi, H., Al-Musalami, J., Al-Oufi, H. & Zaibet, L. (2007). Estimating consumer preferences for value-added fish products in Oman. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 13(2): 47-68.
  • Can, M. F., Günlü, A. & Can, H. Y. (2015). Fish consumption preferences and factors influencing it. Food Science and Technology, 35(2): 339-346. http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.6624
  • Cengiz, D. & Özoğul, F. (2019). The survey study of seafood consumption in Adana and Mersin cities. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 37(1): 159-168.
  • Claret, A., Guerrero, L., Aguirre, E., Rincon, L., Hernandez, M. D., Martinez, I., Benito Peleteiro, J., Grau, A., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, C. (2012) Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: Exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2): 259-266.
  • Collins, M. (1986). Sampling. p. (85-110). In: Worcester, R.M., Donwham, J. (eds.), Consumer Market Research Handbook. McGraw-Hill Press, London. 840p.
  • Dal, B., Kızılaslan, H. & Dal, T. (2019). Fish consumption preferences of consumers and determination of criteria affecting fish consumption by analytical hierarchical process (AHS) method (Tokat Province of Almus District). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(10): 1526-1532. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i10.1526-1532.2479
  • Dilek, S., Paruğ, Ş., Paruğ, A. & Kesgingöz, H. (2019). Seafood Consumption Preferences and Fish Demand in Kastamonu. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(11): 1844-1857. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1844-1857.2751
  • FAO. & WHO. (2011). Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption, Rome, 25–29 January 2010. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 978. Rome.
  • FAO. (2018). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome. 210p.
  • GDFA. (2019). Fisheries Statistics. General Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Retrieved on November 14, 2019 from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/BSGM.pdf
  • Geslani, C., Loke, M. K., Barnes-Mauthe, M. & Leung, P. (2015) Seafood purchasing preferences of Hawaii Chefs: Comparing actual purchase to stated preferences from conjoint choice experiment. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 27(1): 50-63.
  • Hanis, A., Jinap, S., Mad Nasir, S. & Alias, R. (2013) Eliciting Malaysian consumer preferences for marine fish attributes by using conjoint analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(12): 2054-2060.
  • Kale, S. (2017a). Climatic trends in the temperature of Çanakkale city, Turkey. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 2(3): 14-27. https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.348449
  • Kale, S. (2017b). Analysis of climatic trends in evaporation for Çanakkale (Turkey). Middle East Journal of Science, 3(2): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.23884/mejs.2017.3.2.01
  • Kızılaslan, H. & Nalinci, S. (2013). The fish meat consumption habits of households and the factors affecting their fish meat consumption in the province of Amasya. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, 5: 61-75.
  • Lee, M-K. & Nam, J. (2019). The determinants of live fish consumption frequency in South Korea. Food Research International, 120: 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.005
  • Özer, O. O., Gül Yavuz, G. & Gül, U. (2016). Demographic factors influencing consumer preferences of seafood consumption: Central Anatolia Region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 4(5): 356-364.
  • Selvi, K., Kandemir, G. & Özdikmenli Tepeli, S. (2019). Determination of factors affecting on the fish consumption habit in rural areas: The case of Çan (Çanakkale). COMU Journal of Marine Science and Fisheries, 2(2): 132-141.
  • TurkStat. (2019) Statistics for Fishery Products in 2018. Turkish Statistical Institue Press Release, No: 30697. Retrieved on August 3, 2019 from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30697#
  • Ünal, V., Acarli, D. & Gordoa, A. (2010). Characteristics of marine recreational fishing in the Çanakkale Strait (Turkey). Mediterranean Marine Science, 11(2): 315-330. http://doi.org/10.12681/mms.79
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Balıkçılık Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Fahri Saka 0000-0002-3438-0473

Musa Bulut 0000-0002-4997-8208

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Aralık 2019
Kabul Tarihi 10 Ocak 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Saka, F., & Bulut, M. (2020). Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 9(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.658093
AMA Saka F, Bulut M. Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. Haziran 2020;9(1):7-14. doi:10.33714/masteb.658093
Chicago Saka, Fahri, ve Musa Bulut. “Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 9, sy. 1 (Haziran 2020): 7-14. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.658093.
EndNote Saka F, Bulut M (01 Haziran 2020) Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 9 1 7–14.
IEEE F. Saka ve M. Bulut, “Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale”, Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull., c. 9, sy. 1, ss. 7–14, 2020, doi: 10.33714/masteb.658093.
ISNAD Saka, Fahri - Bulut, Musa. “Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 9/1 (Haziran 2020), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.658093.
JAMA Saka F, Bulut M. Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. 2020;9:7–14.
MLA Saka, Fahri ve Musa Bulut. “Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, c. 9, sy. 1, 2020, ss. 7-14, doi:10.33714/masteb.658093.
Vancouver Saka F, Bulut M. Determination of Fish Consumption in Çanakkale. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. 2020;9(1):7-14.

Cited By

Tunceli (Pertek ve Çemişgezek) ile Elazığ (Keban ve Sivrice) İlçelerinde Balık Tüketim Alışkanlıklarının Araştırılması ve Karşılaştırılması
International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences
https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.1364307
Determination of Fish Consumption Habits of Consumers: Case Study of Mary City, Turkmenistan
Marine Science and Technology Bulletin
https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.685436
Determination of Shellfish Consumption Preferences and Habits in Erzurum Province
Marine Science and Technology Bulletin
https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.760548
Consumption of fishery products in Turkey's coastal regions
British Food Journal
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2020-0442
 Kapak Resmi İndir

27116