Abstract
Abstract
There is an organic link between the ecological problems
of the contemporary world and their impacts and the solutions. The measures
that will be taken for one or two problems will be immediately reflected on one
another or some others. Therefore, the Directive on Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control which comprises the realization of waste reduction and
recycling activities that will be implemented in order to minimize the
polluting effects of the industry to the air, water and the soil is of great
importance.
In this context, in this study the introduction of
Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and its compliance with
Turkey was investigated.
In addition, this study aims
at emphasizing the environmental obligations brought to government
organizations and industry with the introduction of European Union’s Directive
on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC 96/61/EG). Particularly,
the details regarding the importance of fulfilling the obligations of the
related the Directive for the candidate countries that are obliged to ensure
compliance with EU legislations in terms of the process of compliance with the
Directive.
In addition to all these obligations and environmental implementation measures related
to the Directive, the level of implementation of the Directive in Turkey, its
effects were also included in the evaluations conducted in this study. Because, the studies show that a viable
method for assessing the impact of environmental regulations has not gained
effect so far in Turkey. This study aims to assess the current situation of the
Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control for Turkey.
Keywords
industrial pollution pollution prevention Environmental management İntegrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive waste minimization
References
- 1] Erengüç A, 2007. Regulatory Impact Analysıs Of Eu Integrated Pollutıon Preventıon And Control Dırectıve And A Case Study; Iron And Steel Industry, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institue of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 133 p.
- [2] Niemczynowicz J, 1994. New Aspects of Urban Drainage and Pollution Reduction Towards Sustainability, Water Science and Technology, 30:269-277.
- [3] Fresner J. Schnitzer H, Gwehenberger G, Planasch M, Brunner C, Taferner K, Mair J, 2007. Practical Experiences With the Implementation of the Consept of Zero Emissions In the Suface Treatment Industry In Austria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15: 1228-1239.
- [4] Turan T, Bayhan Y K, 2009. Comparing the Protection of Water Resources Politics in European Union and Turkey. Atatürk University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 13:2:331-340.
- [5] Şenoğlu S, 2006. Formation Of European Union And Turkey Environmental Policies And Examination Of İntegrated Pollution And Preventation Control(IPPC) Directive (Textile İndustry Example), Master Thesis, Çukurova University, Institue of Science and Technology, Bursa, 106 p.
- [6] Republic of Turkey Ministry of Science, Industrial and Technology, 2012. http://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr/tr/news/proaktif-cevre-yonetim-yaklasimi-eko-verimlilik-temiz-uretim/ [accessed 05.XI.2015]
- [7] Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2006. EU Integrated Enviromental Approximation Strategy, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forests, Ankara. 82 p.
- [8] Külahlıoğlu D. 2002. European Union Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive and Turkey, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institue of Science and Technology, İstanbul, p. 43-45.
- [9] Derilioğlu G. 2007. Evaluating The Legislation On Environmental Policy Of European Union And Current Legislation in Turkey, Master Thesis, Çukurova University, Institue of Science and Technology, Adana, p. 66-69.
- [10] REC 2011. Sustainable Production and Consumption Publications-II, Cleaner Production, Regional Environment Center-REC, Ankara, Turkey, 30 p.
- [11] İZKA TTGV 2012. The Strategy Study of Generalization of the Application of Eco-efficiency (Clean Production) in İzmir, İzmir Development Agency, The Technology Development Foundation of Turkey, İzmir, 105 p.
Abstract
Özet
Günümüz dünyasının ekolojik sorunları ile bunların etki şekilleri ve
çözüm yolları arasında organik bir bağ vardır. Dolayısıyla bir ya da iki
sorunda alınacak önlemler veya uygulanacak yöntemler diğerine ya da diğerlerine
de hemen yansıyacaktır. Bu nedenle endüstrilerin havaya, suya ve toprağa olan
kirletici etkilerinin en aza indirilmesi için uygulanacak olan atık azaltma ve
geri kazanım faaliyetlerinin sağlandığı Entegre Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrol
Direktifi önem taşımaktadır.
Bu kapsamda, çalışmada Entegre Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrol (EKÖK) Direktifinin
ortaya çıkış amacı ve bunun Türkiye ile uyumlaştırılması araştırılmıştır. Avrupa
Birliği Entegre Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrolü Direktifi (96/61/EC)’nin kamu
kuruluşlarına ve sanayiye getirdiği çevresel yükümlülükleri vurgulamayı
amaçlamaktadır. Özellikle AB mevzuatına uyum sağlamakla yükümlü aday ülkelerin ilgili
direktifin yükümlülüklerini hangi noktada yerine getirmesinin ne gibi önem arz
ettiğinden de bahsedilmiştir.
Tüm bu gereklilik ve Direktife bağlı çevresel uygulama tedbirlerinin
yanında ilgili Direktifin ülkemizde uygulanma düzeyi ve etkileri de
değerlendirmeler arasında yer almıştır. Çünkü çevresel düzenlemelerin
etkilerinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik uygulanabilir bir yöntemin ülkemizde
henüz etkinlik kazanmadığı yapılan çalışmalardan görülmektedir. Çalışma Entegre
Kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrolü Direktifi’nin Türkiye için bir durum tespitinin ortaya
konmasını amaçlamaktadır.
Keywords
Çevre yönetimi endüstriyel kirlenme Entegre kirlilik Önleme ve Kontrol Direktifi kirlilik önleme atık minimizasyonu
References
- 1] Erengüç A, 2007. Regulatory Impact Analysıs Of Eu Integrated Pollutıon Preventıon And Control Dırectıve And A Case Study; Iron And Steel Industry, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institue of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 133 p.
- [2] Niemczynowicz J, 1994. New Aspects of Urban Drainage and Pollution Reduction Towards Sustainability, Water Science and Technology, 30:269-277.
- [3] Fresner J. Schnitzer H, Gwehenberger G, Planasch M, Brunner C, Taferner K, Mair J, 2007. Practical Experiences With the Implementation of the Consept of Zero Emissions In the Suface Treatment Industry In Austria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15: 1228-1239.
- [4] Turan T, Bayhan Y K, 2009. Comparing the Protection of Water Resources Politics in European Union and Turkey. Atatürk University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 13:2:331-340.
- [5] Şenoğlu S, 2006. Formation Of European Union And Turkey Environmental Policies And Examination Of İntegrated Pollution And Preventation Control(IPPC) Directive (Textile İndustry Example), Master Thesis, Çukurova University, Institue of Science and Technology, Bursa, 106 p.
- [6] Republic of Turkey Ministry of Science, Industrial and Technology, 2012. http://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr/tr/news/proaktif-cevre-yonetim-yaklasimi-eko-verimlilik-temiz-uretim/ [accessed 05.XI.2015]
- [7] Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2006. EU Integrated Enviromental Approximation Strategy, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forests, Ankara. 82 p.
- [8] Külahlıoğlu D. 2002. European Union Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive and Turkey, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institue of Science and Technology, İstanbul, p. 43-45.
- [9] Derilioğlu G. 2007. Evaluating The Legislation On Environmental Policy Of European Union And Current Legislation in Turkey, Master Thesis, Çukurova University, Institue of Science and Technology, Adana, p. 66-69.
- [10] REC 2011. Sustainable Production and Consumption Publications-II, Cleaner Production, Regional Environment Center-REC, Ankara, Turkey, 30 p.
- [11] İZKA TTGV 2012. The Strategy Study of Generalization of the Application of Eco-efficiency (Clean Production) in İzmir, İzmir Development Agency, The Technology Development Foundation of Turkey, İzmir, 105 p.
Details
| Journal Section | Reviews |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 9, 2016 |
| Submission Date | June 3, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 1 Issue: 1 |
