Review
BibTex RIS Cite

İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERİN BAŞARISINDA OKLÜZYONUN YERİ

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 927 - 933, 26.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1070533

Abstract

Kaybedilen dişlerin protetik rehabilitasyonu için dental implantların kullanımı, günümüz diş hekimliğinde oldıukça sık kullanılan bir tedavi seçeneğidir. Ancak, bu tedavi protokolü uygulanırken oklüzyon prensiplerine dikkat edilmediğinde komplikasyonlar ve hatta implant kayıpları görülebilmektedir. İmplant destekli protezlerin başarısızlığında rol alan ana nedenlerden biri olan aşırı oklüzal kuvvetler, krestal kemik kaybıyla birlikte implant çevresinde anaerobik sulkus derinliğini arttırarak peri-implantitise neden olabilmektedir. Mekanik prensiplere uygun bir oklüzyon elde edilmesi, kuvvetlerin ağırlıklı olarak implant gövdesinin uzun ekseni boyunca yönlendirilmesi anlamına gelmektedir. Bu derlemede, oklüzal kuvvetlerin, dental implantları ve etrafındaki kemiği nasıl etkileyebileceği açıklanacak ve oluşabilecek komplikasyonlar hakkında bilgi verilerek, implant üstü protezlerin okluzal uyumlamaları hakkında klinik önerilerde bulunulacaktır.

References

  • 1. Verma M, Nanda A, Sood A. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization. 2015;7(3):27.
  • 2. Abichandani SJ, Bhojaraju N, Guttal S, Srilakshmi J. Implant protected occlusion: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Prosthodontics. 2013;1(2):29.
  • 3. Gartner JL, Mushimoto K, Weber H-P, Nishimura I, of Dentistry US. Effect of osseointegrated implants on the coordination of masticatory muscles: a pilot study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2000;84(2):185-93.
  • 4. Hämmerle C, Wagner D, Brägger U, Lussi A, Karayiannis A, Joss A, et al. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(2):83-90.
  • 5. Sheridan RA, Decker AM, Plonka AB, Wang H-L. The role of occlusion in implant therapy: a comprehensive updated review. Implant dentistry. 2016;25(6):829-
  • 6. Chen Y-Y, Kuan C-L, Wang YB. Implant occlusion: Biomechanical considerations for implant-supported prostheses. J Dent Sci. 2008;3(2):65-74.
  • 7. Gargallo Albiol J, Satorres Nieto M, Puyuelo Capablo JL, Sánchez Garcés M, Pi Urgell J, Gay Escoda C. Endosseous dental implant fractures an analysis of 21 cases. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2008, vol 13, num 2, p 124-128. 2008.
  • 8. Walter L, Greenstein G. Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a review of the literature. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2020;151(10):790-5.
  • 9. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Implant supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(3):303-11.
  • 10. Lima LA, Bosshardt DD, Chambrone L, Araújo MG, Lang NP. Excessive occlusal load on chemically modified and moderately rough titanium implants restored with cantilever reconstructions. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1142-54.
  • 11. Zhou Y, Gao J, Luo L, Wang Y. Does bruxism contribute to dental implant failure . Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(2):410-20.
  • 12. Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(3):460-9.
  • 13. Lin W-S, Ercoli C, Lowenguth R, Yerke LM, Morton D. Oral rehabilitation of a patient with bruxism and cluster implant failures in the edentulous maxilla: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2012;108(1):1-8.
  • 14. Chaichanasiri E, Nanakorn P, Tharanon W, Sloten JV. Finite element analysis of bone around a dental implant supporting a crown with a premature contact. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(10):1336-44.
  • 15. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2003;90(2):121-32.
  • 16. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clinical oral implants research. 2005;16(1):26-35.
  • 17. Heitz Mayfield L, Schmid B, Weigel C, Gerber S, Bosshardt D, Jönsson J, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(3):259-68.
  • 18. Kozlovsky A, Tal H, Laufer BZ, Leshem R, Rohrer MD, Weinreb M, et al. Impact of implant overloading on the peri implant bone in inflamed and non- inflamed peri implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):601-10.
  • 19. Mendonça JA, Francischone CE, Senna PM, Matos de Oliveira AE, Sotto Maior BS. A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws. J Periodontol. 2014;85(6):787-94.
  • 20. Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan Y, Özkan YK. İmplant destekli restorasyonlarda okluzyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011;2011(4):57-64.
  • 21. Acar A, İnan Ö. İmplant destekli protezlerde okluzyon. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;4(1):52-6.
  • 22. Misch C, Bidez M. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium (Newtown, Pa). 1994;15(11):1330,
  • 23. Katona TR, Goodacre CJ, Brown DT, Roberts WE. Force-moment systems on single maxillary anterior implants: effects of incisal guidance, fixture orientation, and loss of bone support. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1993;8(5).
  • 24. Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant dentistry. 1998;7(4):277-85.
  • 25. Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, Santana U. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant borne prostheses. A review. International dental journal. 2008;58(3):139-45.
  • 26. Graves CV, Harrel SK, Rossmann JA, Kerns D, Gonzalez JA, Kontogiorgos ED, et al. The role of occlusion in the dental implant and peri-implant condition: a review. The open dentistry journal. 2016;10:594.
  • 27. Jambhekar S, Kheur M, Kothavade M, Dugal R. Occlusion and occlusal considerations in implantology. IJDA. 2010;2(1):125-30.
  • 28. Lin CL, Wang JC, Chang WJ. Biomechanical interactions in tooth–implant supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2008;19(1):107-17.
  • 29. Richter E. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1989;61(5):602-9.
  • 30. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial denture. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1995;74(5):487-92.
  • 31. Ramoglu,S, Tasar S, Gunsoy S, Ozan O, Meric G. Tooth-implant connection: a review. ISRN Biomaterials. 2012;2013.
  • 32. Jambhekar,S., Kheur, M., Kothavade, M., & Dugal, R. Occlusion and occlusal considerations in implantology. 2010; IJDA, 2(1), 125-130.
  • 33. Chapman,R.J. (1989). Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. Quintessence Int, 20(7), 473-480.
  • 34. Wismeijer,D., van Waas, M. A., & Kalk, W. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1995;74(4), 380-384.
  • 35. D. Mericske Stern, R., Taylor, T. D., & Belser, U. ( Management of the edentulous patient. Clinical Oral Implants Research: Chapter 2000;7, 11, 108-125
  • 36. Ergünbaş,B. & Zortuk M. İmplant Üstü Protezlerde Oklüzyonun Alveolar Kemik Rezorpsiyonu Üzerine Etkisi. Dental and Medical Journal-Review, 2021;3(2), 83-96.
  • 37. Şahin, S. Cehreli, M. C. Yalçın, E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. Journal of dentistry, 2002;30(7-8), 271-282.
  • 38. Frost, H. M. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004;74(1), 3-15.
Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 927 - 933, 26.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1070533

Abstract

References

  • 1. Verma M, Nanda A, Sood A. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization. 2015;7(3):27.
  • 2. Abichandani SJ, Bhojaraju N, Guttal S, Srilakshmi J. Implant protected occlusion: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Prosthodontics. 2013;1(2):29.
  • 3. Gartner JL, Mushimoto K, Weber H-P, Nishimura I, of Dentistry US. Effect of osseointegrated implants on the coordination of masticatory muscles: a pilot study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2000;84(2):185-93.
  • 4. Hämmerle C, Wagner D, Brägger U, Lussi A, Karayiannis A, Joss A, et al. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(2):83-90.
  • 5. Sheridan RA, Decker AM, Plonka AB, Wang H-L. The role of occlusion in implant therapy: a comprehensive updated review. Implant dentistry. 2016;25(6):829-
  • 6. Chen Y-Y, Kuan C-L, Wang YB. Implant occlusion: Biomechanical considerations for implant-supported prostheses. J Dent Sci. 2008;3(2):65-74.
  • 7. Gargallo Albiol J, Satorres Nieto M, Puyuelo Capablo JL, Sánchez Garcés M, Pi Urgell J, Gay Escoda C. Endosseous dental implant fractures an analysis of 21 cases. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2008, vol 13, num 2, p 124-128. 2008.
  • 8. Walter L, Greenstein G. Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a review of the literature. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2020;151(10):790-5.
  • 9. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Implant supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(3):303-11.
  • 10. Lima LA, Bosshardt DD, Chambrone L, Araújo MG, Lang NP. Excessive occlusal load on chemically modified and moderately rough titanium implants restored with cantilever reconstructions. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1142-54.
  • 11. Zhou Y, Gao J, Luo L, Wang Y. Does bruxism contribute to dental implant failure . Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(2):410-20.
  • 12. Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(3):460-9.
  • 13. Lin W-S, Ercoli C, Lowenguth R, Yerke LM, Morton D. Oral rehabilitation of a patient with bruxism and cluster implant failures in the edentulous maxilla: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2012;108(1):1-8.
  • 14. Chaichanasiri E, Nanakorn P, Tharanon W, Sloten JV. Finite element analysis of bone around a dental implant supporting a crown with a premature contact. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(10):1336-44.
  • 15. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2003;90(2):121-32.
  • 16. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clinical oral implants research. 2005;16(1):26-35.
  • 17. Heitz Mayfield L, Schmid B, Weigel C, Gerber S, Bosshardt D, Jönsson J, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(3):259-68.
  • 18. Kozlovsky A, Tal H, Laufer BZ, Leshem R, Rohrer MD, Weinreb M, et al. Impact of implant overloading on the peri implant bone in inflamed and non- inflamed peri implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):601-10.
  • 19. Mendonça JA, Francischone CE, Senna PM, Matos de Oliveira AE, Sotto Maior BS. A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws. J Periodontol. 2014;85(6):787-94.
  • 20. Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan Y, Özkan YK. İmplant destekli restorasyonlarda okluzyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011;2011(4):57-64.
  • 21. Acar A, İnan Ö. İmplant destekli protezlerde okluzyon. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;4(1):52-6.
  • 22. Misch C, Bidez M. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium (Newtown, Pa). 1994;15(11):1330,
  • 23. Katona TR, Goodacre CJ, Brown DT, Roberts WE. Force-moment systems on single maxillary anterior implants: effects of incisal guidance, fixture orientation, and loss of bone support. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1993;8(5).
  • 24. Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant dentistry. 1998;7(4):277-85.
  • 25. Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, Santana U. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant borne prostheses. A review. International dental journal. 2008;58(3):139-45.
  • 26. Graves CV, Harrel SK, Rossmann JA, Kerns D, Gonzalez JA, Kontogiorgos ED, et al. The role of occlusion in the dental implant and peri-implant condition: a review. The open dentistry journal. 2016;10:594.
  • 27. Jambhekar S, Kheur M, Kothavade M, Dugal R. Occlusion and occlusal considerations in implantology. IJDA. 2010;2(1):125-30.
  • 28. Lin CL, Wang JC, Chang WJ. Biomechanical interactions in tooth–implant supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2008;19(1):107-17.
  • 29. Richter E. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1989;61(5):602-9.
  • 30. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial denture. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1995;74(5):487-92.
  • 31. Ramoglu,S, Tasar S, Gunsoy S, Ozan O, Meric G. Tooth-implant connection: a review. ISRN Biomaterials. 2012;2013.
  • 32. Jambhekar,S., Kheur, M., Kothavade, M., & Dugal, R. Occlusion and occlusal considerations in implantology. 2010; IJDA, 2(1), 125-130.
  • 33. Chapman,R.J. (1989). Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. Quintessence Int, 20(7), 473-480.
  • 34. Wismeijer,D., van Waas, M. A., & Kalk, W. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1995;74(4), 380-384.
  • 35. D. Mericske Stern, R., Taylor, T. D., & Belser, U. ( Management of the edentulous patient. Clinical Oral Implants Research: Chapter 2000;7, 11, 108-125
  • 36. Ergünbaş,B. & Zortuk M. İmplant Üstü Protezlerde Oklüzyonun Alveolar Kemik Rezorpsiyonu Üzerine Etkisi. Dental and Medical Journal-Review, 2021;3(2), 83-96.
  • 37. Şahin, S. Cehreli, M. C. Yalçın, E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. Journal of dentistry, 2002;30(7-8), 271-282.
  • 38. Frost, H. M. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004;74(1), 3-15.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Review
Authors

Firdevs Oral 0000-0002-7854-0176

Emine Hülya Demir Sevinç

Arzu Zeynep Yıldırım 0000-0002-9332-8982

Publication Date December 26, 2022
Submission Date February 9, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Oral F, Demir Sevinç EH, Yıldırım AZ. İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERİN BAŞARISINDA OKLÜZYONUN YERİ. Selcuk Dent J. 2022;9(3):927-33.