Effect of Storage Time on Tear Strength of Extended-Pour Irreversible Hydrocolloid Impression Materials
Abstract
Amaç:
Bu in-vitro çalışmanın amacı; uzatılmış saklama sürelerinin, uzatılmış model
elde etme süresine sahip irreversible hidrokolloid ölçü malzemelerinin yırtılma
dayanımı üzerine etkisini incelemektir.
Materyal-Metod: Beş
ticari (BluePrint
Xcreme, Hydrogum 5, Kromopan, Alginmax
ve Alginelle) ve bir özel formüle
edilmiş uzatılmış model etme süresine
sahip irreversible hidrokolloid ölçü malzemesi kullanılarak ISO 21563:2013
standartlarına uyumlu seksen dört adet numune hazırlanmıştır. Her bir ölçü malzemesine sait numuneler rastgele iki gruba ayrılmış (n=7) ve hemen
veya 120 saatlik saklama süresi sonunda yırtılma testine tabi
tutulmuşlardır. Yırtılma dayanımı değerleri N/mm cinsinden ifade edilmiş ve
veriler iki yönlü varyans analizi testi
(irreversible hidrokolloid markası, saklama süresi) kullanılarak analiz
edilmiştir. Çoklu karşılaştırmalara, Tukey testi kullanılarak yapılmıştır (p=0.05).
Bulgular:
Uzatılmış model etme süresine sahip irreversible
hidrokolloid ölçü malzemelerinin yırtılma dayanımları, irreversible
hidrokolloid markası parametresi (p<0.0001) ve irreversible
hidrokolloid markası-saklama süresi etkileşimi tarafından etkilenmiştir (p=0.005).
tarafından etkilenmiştir Saklama süresi, uzatılmış model etme süresine
sahip irreversible hidrokolloid ölçü malzemelerinin yırtılma dayanımlarını, 120
saat saklama süresi sonunda yırtılma dayanımı artan Alginmax ölçü malzemesi haricinde etkilememiştir (p<0.05). Hemen yapılan yırtılma dayanımı testinde Blueprint
Xcreme en yüksek ortalama yırtılma dayanımı değerlerine sahipken (1.08±0.19 N/mm) Alginelle en düşük
ortalama yırtılma dayanımı değerlerini göstermiştir (0.51±0.3 N/mm). 120
saat saklama süresi sonunda Hydrogum 5 en yüksek ortalama yırtılma dayanımı
değerlerine sahipken (1.15± 0.12 N/mm) Alginelle en düşük ortalama yırtılma dayanımı değerlerini
göstermiştir (0.55±0.04 N/mm).
Sonuç: Test edilen uzatılmış
model elde etme süresine sahip ticari irreversible
hidrokolloid ölçü malzemelerinin tümü,
yırtılma dayanımlarını 120 saatlik saklama süresi sonunda korumuştur.
References
- 1. Anusavice K, Shen, C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2013. p. 151.
- 2. Nandini VV, Venkatesh KV, Nair KC. Alginate impressions: a practical perspective. J Conserv Dent 2008; 11: 37-41.
- 3. Phoenix RD, Rodney D. Stewart’s clinical removable partial prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Hanover: Quintessence; 2002. p. 1627.
- 4. Kaur G, Jain P, Uppal M, Sikka R. Alginate impression materials: from then till now. Heal Talk J Clin Dent 2012; 5:38-9.
- 5. Craig RG, Robert G. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 12.
- 6. Lee EA. Impression material selection in contemporary fixed prosthodontics: technique, rationale, and indications. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26: 780-9.
- 7. Ciapetti G, Granchi D, Stea S, et al. Cytotoxicity testing of materials with limited in vivo exposure is affected by the duration of cell-material contact. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42: 485–90.
- 8. Vrijhoef MMA, Battistuzzi, PG. Tear energy of impression materials. J Dent 1986; 175-7.
- 9. Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Litaker M. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 186-94.
- 10. Marshak BL, Cardash HS, Ben-Ur Z. Incidence of impression material found in the gingival sulcus after impression procedure for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 306-8.
- 11. Donovan JE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 445-70.
- 12. Miller MW. Syneresis in alginate impression materials. Br Dent J 1975; 139: 425-30.
- 13. Jamani KD. The effect of pouring time and storage condition on the accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Saudi Dent J 2002; 14: 126-30.
- 14. Walker MP, Burckhard J, Mitts DA, Williams KB. Dimensional change over time of extended-storage alginate impression materials. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 1110-5.
- 15. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Lautenschlager E. P. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 219–23.
- 16. Lu H, Nguyen B, Powers J. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 151–54.
- 17. Webber RL, Ryge G. The determination of tear energy of extensible materials of dental interest. J. Biomed Mater Res 1968; 2: 281–96.
- 18. Huynh L, Xie DX, Shellard E. Mechanical properties of polysulfide impression materials. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 2667.
- 19. Whiteman Y, Nathanson D. Tear strength and dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials, J Dent Res 2007; 86: 184.
- 20. Dentistry, Hydrocolloid impression materials, ISO 21563 2014-02
- 21. Boghosian A, Lautenschlager EP. Tear strength of low-viscosity elastomeric impression materials. J Dent Res 2003; 82:137.
Effect of storage time on tear strength of extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials
Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of prolonged storage
times on the tear strength of extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloid
impression materials.
Material and Method: Eighty four specimens were fabricated from five commercial extended-pour irreversible
hydrocolloid impression materials (BluePrint Xcreme, Hydrogum 5, Kromopan, Alginmax and Alginelle) as well as one experimental formula in
accordance with the ISO 21563:2013 standard
effective for irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials. Specimens
were randomly divided in two groups for each impression material (n=7) and
subjected to tear strength test immediately (base line) or after 120 hours of
storage. Tear strength values were obtained
in N/mm and data were analysed with
two-way ANOVA (irreversible hydrocolloid brand, storage time). Multiple
comparisons were performed with Tukey’s test (p=0.05).
Results:
The tear strength of the extended-pour
irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials were affected by brand (p<0.0001)
and brand-storage time interaction (p=0.005). Storage time did not influence
the tear strengths of the extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloid impression
materials tested except Alginmax whose mean tear strengths increased after 120
hours of storage (p<0.05). At base
line measurements Blueprint Xcreme provided the highest mean tear strength
values (1.08±0.19 N/mm) whereas Alginelle provided the lowest mean tear strength values
(0.51±0.3 N/mm). Hydrogum 5 provided the highest tear strength values after 120
hours of storage (1.15± 0.12 N/mm)
whereas Alginelle provided the lowest
mean tear strength values (0.55±0.04 N/mm).
Conclusion.
All commercial
extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials tested maintained
their tear strengths after 120 hours of storage.
References
- 1. Anusavice K, Shen, C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2013. p. 151.
- 2. Nandini VV, Venkatesh KV, Nair KC. Alginate impressions: a practical perspective. J Conserv Dent 2008; 11: 37-41.
- 3. Phoenix RD, Rodney D. Stewart’s clinical removable partial prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Hanover: Quintessence; 2002. p. 1627.
- 4. Kaur G, Jain P, Uppal M, Sikka R. Alginate impression materials: from then till now. Heal Talk J Clin Dent 2012; 5:38-9.
- 5. Craig RG, Robert G. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 12.
- 6. Lee EA. Impression material selection in contemporary fixed prosthodontics: technique, rationale, and indications. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26: 780-9.
- 7. Ciapetti G, Granchi D, Stea S, et al. Cytotoxicity testing of materials with limited in vivo exposure is affected by the duration of cell-material contact. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42: 485–90.
- 8. Vrijhoef MMA, Battistuzzi, PG. Tear energy of impression materials. J Dent 1986; 175-7.
- 9. Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Litaker M. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 186-94.
- 10. Marshak BL, Cardash HS, Ben-Ur Z. Incidence of impression material found in the gingival sulcus after impression procedure for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 306-8.
- 11. Donovan JE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 445-70.
- 12. Miller MW. Syneresis in alginate impression materials. Br Dent J 1975; 139: 425-30.
- 13. Jamani KD. The effect of pouring time and storage condition on the accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Saudi Dent J 2002; 14: 126-30.
- 14. Walker MP, Burckhard J, Mitts DA, Williams KB. Dimensional change over time of extended-storage alginate impression materials. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 1110-5.
- 15. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Lautenschlager E. P. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 219–23.
- 16. Lu H, Nguyen B, Powers J. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 151–54.
- 17. Webber RL, Ryge G. The determination of tear energy of extensible materials of dental interest. J. Biomed Mater Res 1968; 2: 281–96.
- 18. Huynh L, Xie DX, Shellard E. Mechanical properties of polysulfide impression materials. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 2667.
- 19. Whiteman Y, Nathanson D. Tear strength and dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials, J Dent Res 2007; 86: 184.
- 20. Dentistry, Hydrocolloid impression materials, ISO 21563 2014-02
- 21. Boghosian A, Lautenschlager EP. Tear strength of low-viscosity elastomeric impression materials. J Dent Res 2003; 82:137.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Araştırma Articlesi |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 6, 2018 |
| Submission Date | July 6, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 9 Issue: 3 |
SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, makalenin gönderilmesi ve yayınlanması dahil olmak üzere hiçbir aşamada herhangi bir ücret talep etmemektedir. Dergimiz, bilimsel araştırmaları okuyucuya ücretsiz sunmanın bilginin küresel paylaşımını artıracağı ilkesini benimseyerek, içeriğine anında açık erişim sağlamaktadır.