Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops

Year 2022, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 30 - 37, 31.03.2022

Sibel Kadıoğlu Mustafa Tan Banu Kadıoğlu Kevser Karagöz Sezer

Abstract

Eastern Anatolia Region is located in an area where three phytogeographical regions intersect. Many of the plants known by the public and used as food in human and animal nutrition or for therapeutic purposes in traditional medicine are found in the natural flora, especially in meadows, pastures and cultivated areas. This study aimed to determine the potential of the plants found in the natural flora, which are still used for different purposes, as alternative forage crops on Kop Mountain where pasture-based stock farming is continued. The study identified 85 plant species, which are ethnobotanically used for food and medicinal purposes, from 25 families. From these genetic resources, cluster analysis was performed on 39 species from 15 families, which have alternative forage crop value. Firstly, B. corolliflora, B. lomatogona, P. cognatum, P. aviculare, P. major, Sinapis arvensis, Rapistrum rugosum, P. lanceolata, C. transsylvanica, C. syriaca, Chenopodium album, Capsella bursa pastoris, Asparagus persicus and Atriplex nitens species were found to be available as alternative forage crops. The data obtained suggests that it is possible to expand the genetic resources of forage crops with plants from different families and species and to increase the diversity of forage crops by means of such studies.

Keywords

Alternative forage crops Ethnobotany Genetic resources Medicinal and aromatic plants Traditional medicine

References

  • Acar, R., & Guncan, A. (2002). Determination of the morphological characteristics and crude protein ratios of some weed character plants that can be used as roughage. Tekirdağ. Süleyman Demirel University Agriculture Journal, 16(29), 79-83.
  • Acar, R., M. & Mulayim. (2001). the effects of different sowing time and plant densities on some yield components and dry matter in forage beet (Beta vulgaris L. rapacea Koch.) Varieties. Turkey 4. Field Crops Congress, Tekirdağ.
  • Acar, R. Ozkose, N., & Koç, A. (2017). Investigation of alternative use potential of cypress vinegar (Atriplex nitens Schkuhr.). Journal of Bahri Dağdaş Crop Research, 6 (2),18-22.
  • Aksakal, O., & Kaya, Y. (2008). Plants used for food purposes by the public in Erzurum and its surroundings. 15-17 June 2008, Turkey 10. Food Congress, Erzurum.
  • Akgoz, Y. (2013). Hazard categories and found new species of the genus Silene flora of Turkey. Journal of Trakya University, 14(81), 31-32.
  • Bhargava, A. Shukla, S., & Ohri, D. (2003). Genetic variability and heritability of selected traits during different cuttings of vegetable Chenopodium. The Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 63(4), 359-360.
  • Balabanli, C. Albayrak, S. Turk, M., & Yuksel, O. (2006). Some harmful effects on plants and animals found in Turkey grassland. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, A(2), 89-96.
  • Baytop, T. (1999). Past and Present Treatment Plant in Turkey. 3ed. Nobel Medical Bookstore., Istanbul, pp.357-452.
  • Bulut, G. (2005). Plants used as folk medicine in Narman (Erzurum) Villages. Atatürk Univ. Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy (Master's Thesis). Erzurum.
  • Christman, S. (2003). Atriplex hortensis. www.floridata.com/ref/a/atri_hor.cfm (Accessed 20 July 2019).
  • Cakmak, Z. Uzgoren, N., & Kecek, G. (2005). Classification of provinces according to their cultural structures and analysis of changes with cluster analysis techniques. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 15-36.
  • Davis, P. H. (1965-85). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1-10, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Gutierrez, R. (20). (Davis, P.H., Phytogeography of Turkey. In Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh (1965).
  • Dogan, A. Bulut, G. Tuzlaci, E., & Senkardes, I. (2014). A Review of edible plants on the Turkish Apiaceae species. J. Fac. Pharm, 44(2), 251-262.
  • Erdem Guzel, M. Gultepe, M. Makbul, S. Bozkir, I., & Coskuncelebi, K. (2019). Contributions to the flora of Bayburt: Cichorieae (Asteraceae). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(3), 498-503.
  • Ertug, F. (2014). Yenen Bitkiler. A. Guner and T. Ekim. (Eds.). Illustrated Flora of Turkey. 1ed. Turkey Is Bank Cultural Publications, Ankara, pp: 345-380.
  • Essawi, T., & Srour, M. (2000). Screening of some Palestinian medicinal plants for antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol, 70, 343.
  • Gokkus, A, Koc, A., & Comakli, B. (1995). Meadow Pasture Application Guide. Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Ofset Facility, Erzurum, pp. 50.
  • Gur, M. Altin, M. Sen, C., & Ozduven, M. L. (2017). The change of feed quality in the growing season in natural pastures with different usage histories. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23, 276-284.
  • Han, M.I., & Bulut, G. (2015). The folk-medicinal plants of Kadisehri (Yozgat - Turkey). Acta S Botanicorum Poloniae, 84(2), 237-248.
  • Ingram, M., & Margetis, S. (2010). A Practical method to estimate the cost of equity for a firm using cluster analysis. Managerial Finance, 36(2), 160-167.
  • Kadioglu, S, Kadioglu, B. Dizikisa, T., & Karagoz Sezer, K. (2021). Ethnobotanical properties of wild plants that grow naturally and are used by the public. Journal of Muş Alparslan University Agricultural Production and Technologies, 1(1), 39-50.
  • Karagoz, A. Zencirci, N. Tan, A. Taskin, T. Koksel, H. Surek, M. Toker, C., & Ozbek, K. (2010). Conservation and use of plant genetic resources. Turkey Agricultural Engineering, VII. Technical Congress, Ankara.
  • Marten, G. C., & Andersen, R. N. (1975). Forage nutritive value and palatability of 12 common annual weeds. Crop Sci, 15, 821-827.
  • Ozer, Z. Tursun, N., & Onen, H. (2001). Healthy Living with Weeds (Food and Treatment). 4 Color Publications, Ankara, pp. 256-327.
  • Ozpinar, H. Inal, F. N. Ay, E. Acar, A., & Sabanci, O. C. (2017). Turkey forage crop genetic resources. Anadolu J. of AARI, 27 (1), 51-55.
  • Polat, R. Cakilcioglu, U. Ertug, F., & Satil, F. (2012). An evaluation of ethnobotanical studies in Eastern Anatolia. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 5(2), 23-40.
  • Polygonum, (2021) .Polygonum. https://sorhocam.com/mobil/konu.asp?sid=942&polygonum-labadagiller.html (Accessed 10 March 2021).
  • Stewart, A.V. (1996). Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) – a potential pasture species. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 58, 77–86.
  • Sehirali, S. Ozgen, M. Karagoz, A. Surek, M. Adak, S. Guvenc, I. Tan, A. Burak, M. Kaymak, H. C., & Kenar, D. (2005). Conservation and use of plant genetic resources. TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural
  • Engineers VI. Technical Congress. Volume 1. Kozan Offset, Ankara, pp.231-238.
  • Tan, A. (2010). Turkey plant genetic resources and conservation. Anadolu J. of AARI, 20(1), 9-37.
  • Tan, M., & Yolcu, H. (2001). Nutritional value characteristics of some plants with weed character as roughage. Turkey 4th Congress Book of Field Crops, Tekirdağ.
  • Tuzlaci, E. (2012). Turkey Plant Dictionary. 2ed. Alfa Publications, Istanbul, pp.357-361.
  • TUIK. (2020). Turkısh Statistical Instıtute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/kategori/ (Accessed 07 August 2020).
  • TUBIVES. (2020). Turkish Plant Data Services. (Accessed 06 August 2020).
  • UBENİS. (2019). National Biodiversity Inventory and Monitoring Project www.milliparklar.gov.tr/envanter/ (Accessed 08 June 2020).
  • Vatansever, M. (2008). The Use and Application of Visual Data Mining Techniques in Cluster Analysis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, Istanbul, pp.534-657.
  • Yapici, U. I. Hosgoren, H., & Saya, O. (2009). Ethnobotanical features of Kurtalan (Siirt) district. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty, 12, 191-196.

Year 2022, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 30 - 37, 31.03.2022

Sibel Kadıoğlu Mustafa Tan Banu Kadıoğlu Kevser Karagöz Sezer

Abstract

References

  • Acar, R., & Guncan, A. (2002). Determination of the morphological characteristics and crude protein ratios of some weed character plants that can be used as roughage. Tekirdağ. Süleyman Demirel University Agriculture Journal, 16(29), 79-83.
  • Acar, R., M. & Mulayim. (2001). the effects of different sowing time and plant densities on some yield components and dry matter in forage beet (Beta vulgaris L. rapacea Koch.) Varieties. Turkey 4. Field Crops Congress, Tekirdağ.
  • Acar, R. Ozkose, N., & Koç, A. (2017). Investigation of alternative use potential of cypress vinegar (Atriplex nitens Schkuhr.). Journal of Bahri Dağdaş Crop Research, 6 (2),18-22.
  • Aksakal, O., & Kaya, Y. (2008). Plants used for food purposes by the public in Erzurum and its surroundings. 15-17 June 2008, Turkey 10. Food Congress, Erzurum.
  • Akgoz, Y. (2013). Hazard categories and found new species of the genus Silene flora of Turkey. Journal of Trakya University, 14(81), 31-32.
  • Bhargava, A. Shukla, S., & Ohri, D. (2003). Genetic variability and heritability of selected traits during different cuttings of vegetable Chenopodium. The Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 63(4), 359-360.
  • Balabanli, C. Albayrak, S. Turk, M., & Yuksel, O. (2006). Some harmful effects on plants and animals found in Turkey grassland. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, A(2), 89-96.
  • Baytop, T. (1999). Past and Present Treatment Plant in Turkey. 3ed. Nobel Medical Bookstore., Istanbul, pp.357-452.
  • Bulut, G. (2005). Plants used as folk medicine in Narman (Erzurum) Villages. Atatürk Univ. Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy (Master's Thesis). Erzurum.
  • Christman, S. (2003). Atriplex hortensis. www.floridata.com/ref/a/atri_hor.cfm (Accessed 20 July 2019).
  • Cakmak, Z. Uzgoren, N., & Kecek, G. (2005). Classification of provinces according to their cultural structures and analysis of changes with cluster analysis techniques. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 15-36.
  • Davis, P. H. (1965-85). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1-10, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Gutierrez, R. (20). (Davis, P.H., Phytogeography of Turkey. In Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh (1965).
  • Dogan, A. Bulut, G. Tuzlaci, E., & Senkardes, I. (2014). A Review of edible plants on the Turkish Apiaceae species. J. Fac. Pharm, 44(2), 251-262.
  • Erdem Guzel, M. Gultepe, M. Makbul, S. Bozkir, I., & Coskuncelebi, K. (2019). Contributions to the flora of Bayburt: Cichorieae (Asteraceae). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(3), 498-503.
  • Ertug, F. (2014). Yenen Bitkiler. A. Guner and T. Ekim. (Eds.). Illustrated Flora of Turkey. 1ed. Turkey Is Bank Cultural Publications, Ankara, pp: 345-380.
  • Essawi, T., & Srour, M. (2000). Screening of some Palestinian medicinal plants for antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol, 70, 343.
  • Gokkus, A, Koc, A., & Comakli, B. (1995). Meadow Pasture Application Guide. Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Ofset Facility, Erzurum, pp. 50.
  • Gur, M. Altin, M. Sen, C., & Ozduven, M. L. (2017). The change of feed quality in the growing season in natural pastures with different usage histories. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23, 276-284.
  • Han, M.I., & Bulut, G. (2015). The folk-medicinal plants of Kadisehri (Yozgat - Turkey). Acta S Botanicorum Poloniae, 84(2), 237-248.
  • Ingram, M., & Margetis, S. (2010). A Practical method to estimate the cost of equity for a firm using cluster analysis. Managerial Finance, 36(2), 160-167.
  • Kadioglu, S, Kadioglu, B. Dizikisa, T., & Karagoz Sezer, K. (2021). Ethnobotanical properties of wild plants that grow naturally and are used by the public. Journal of Muş Alparslan University Agricultural Production and Technologies, 1(1), 39-50.
  • Karagoz, A. Zencirci, N. Tan, A. Taskin, T. Koksel, H. Surek, M. Toker, C., & Ozbek, K. (2010). Conservation and use of plant genetic resources. Turkey Agricultural Engineering, VII. Technical Congress, Ankara.
  • Marten, G. C., & Andersen, R. N. (1975). Forage nutritive value and palatability of 12 common annual weeds. Crop Sci, 15, 821-827.
  • Ozer, Z. Tursun, N., & Onen, H. (2001). Healthy Living with Weeds (Food and Treatment). 4 Color Publications, Ankara, pp. 256-327.
  • Ozpinar, H. Inal, F. N. Ay, E. Acar, A., & Sabanci, O. C. (2017). Turkey forage crop genetic resources. Anadolu J. of AARI, 27 (1), 51-55.
  • Polat, R. Cakilcioglu, U. Ertug, F., & Satil, F. (2012). An evaluation of ethnobotanical studies in Eastern Anatolia. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 5(2), 23-40.
  • Polygonum, (2021) .Polygonum. https://sorhocam.com/mobil/konu.asp?sid=942&polygonum-labadagiller.html (Accessed 10 March 2021).
  • Stewart, A.V. (1996). Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) – a potential pasture species. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 58, 77–86.
  • Sehirali, S. Ozgen, M. Karagoz, A. Surek, M. Adak, S. Guvenc, I. Tan, A. Burak, M. Kaymak, H. C., & Kenar, D. (2005). Conservation and use of plant genetic resources. TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural
  • Engineers VI. Technical Congress. Volume 1. Kozan Offset, Ankara, pp.231-238.
  • Tan, A. (2010). Turkey plant genetic resources and conservation. Anadolu J. of AARI, 20(1), 9-37.
  • Tan, M., & Yolcu, H. (2001). Nutritional value characteristics of some plants with weed character as roughage. Turkey 4th Congress Book of Field Crops, Tekirdağ.
  • Tuzlaci, E. (2012). Turkey Plant Dictionary. 2ed. Alfa Publications, Istanbul, pp.357-361.
  • TUIK. (2020). Turkısh Statistical Instıtute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/kategori/ (Accessed 07 August 2020).
  • TUBIVES. (2020). Turkish Plant Data Services. (Accessed 06 August 2020).
  • UBENİS. (2019). National Biodiversity Inventory and Monitoring Project www.milliparklar.gov.tr/envanter/ (Accessed 08 June 2020).
  • Vatansever, M. (2008). The Use and Application of Visual Data Mining Techniques in Cluster Analysis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, Istanbul, pp.534-657.
  • Yapici, U. I. Hosgoren, H., & Saya, O. (2009). Ethnobotanical features of Kurtalan (Siirt) district. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty, 12, 191-196.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Botany
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Sibel Kadıoğlu 0000-0002-9121-1705

Mustafa Tan This is me 0000-0001-7939-7087

Banu Kadıoğlu 0000-0002-9041-5992

Kevser Karagöz Sezer This is me

Publication Date March 31, 2022
Submission Date November 15, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kadıoğlu, S., Tan, M., Kadıoğlu, B., Karagöz Sezer, K. (2022). Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 2(1), 30-37.
AMA Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K. Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. MAU J Agr Nat. March 2022;2(1):30-37.
Chicago Kadıoğlu, Sibel, Mustafa Tan, Banu Kadıoğlu, and Kevser Karagöz Sezer. “Determination of the Usability of Some Ethnobotanically Used Wild Plant Species As Forage Crops”. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature 2, no. 1 (March 2022): 30-37.
EndNote Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K (March 1, 2022) Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature 2 1 30–37.
IEEE S. Kadıoğlu, M. Tan, B. Kadıoğlu, and K. Karagöz Sezer, “Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops”, MAU J Agr Nat, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2022.
ISNAD Kadıoğlu, Sibel et al. “Determination of the Usability of Some Ethnobotanically Used Wild Plant Species As Forage Crops”. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature 2/1 (March 2022), 30-37.
JAMA Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K. Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. MAU J Agr Nat. 2022;2:30–37.
MLA Kadıoğlu, Sibel et al. “Determination of the Usability of Some Ethnobotanically Used Wild Plant Species As Forage Crops”. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, pp. 30-37.
Vancouver Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K. Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. MAU J Agr Nat. 2022;2(1):30-7.
 Download Cover Image


Flag Counter

Creative Commons Lisansı

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.