Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 33 Issue: 1, 62 - 72, 01.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463

Abstract

References

  • Aghaei, J., & Alizadeh, M. I. (2013). Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 64-72.
  • Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F., & Sohrabkhani, S. (2008). Annual electricity consumption forecasting by neural network in high energy consuming industrial sectors. Energy Conversion and management, 49(8), 2272-2278.
  • Bakhshaii, A., & Stull, R. (2012). Electric load forecasting for western Canada: A comparison of two non-linear methods. Atmosphere-Ocean, 50(3), 352-363.
  • Balk, B., & Elder, K. (2000). Combining binary decision tree and geostatistical methods to estimate snow distribution in a mountain watershed. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 13-26.
  • Bhattacharya, M., Abraham, A., & Nath, B. (2002). A linear genetic programming approach for modelling electricity demand prediction in Victoria. In Hybrid Information Systems, 379-393. Physica, Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany Springer-Verlag.
  • Breiman, L., J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1984.
  • Çunkaş, M., & Taşkiran, U. (2011). Turkey's electricity consumption forecasting using genetic programming. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(4), 406-416.
  • Danandeh Mehr A., Bagheri, F., & Reşatoğlu, R. (2018a) “A genetic programming approach to forecast daily electricity demand. 13th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing. Warsaw, Poland, 27–28 August.
  • Danandeh Mehr, A., Nourani, V., Kahya, E., Hrnjica, B., Sattar, A. M., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2018b). Genetic programming in water resources engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Hydrology 566, 643-667.
  • Danandeh Mehr, A., Nourani, V., Hrnjica, B., & Molajou, A. (2017). A binary genetic programing model for teleconnection identification between global sea surface temperature and local maximum monthly rainfall events. Journal of Hydrology, 555, 397-406.
  • Ekonomou, L. (2010). Greek long-term energy consumption prediction using artificial neural networks. Energy, 35(2), 512-517.
  • Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier.
  • Hrnjica, B., & Danandeh Mehr, A. (2019). Optimized Genetic Programming Applications: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey, PA, USA, IGI-Global.
  • Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C. K., & Ranka, S. (2000). Elements of artificial neural networks. 2nd ed. Massachusetts, USA, MIT press.
  • Mousavi, S. M., Mostafavi, E. S., & Hosseinpour, F. (2014). Gene expression programming as a basis for new generation of electricity demand prediction models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 120-128.
  • Mwasilu, F., Justo, J. J., Kim, E. K., Do, T. D., & Jung, J. W. (2014). Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: A review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 34, 501-516.
  • Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
  • Safari, M. J. S. (2019). DT, GR and MARS models for sediment transport in sewer pipes. Water Science and Technology https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.106.
  • Tso, G. K., & Yau, K. K. (2007). Predicting electricity energy consumption: A comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks. Energy, 32(9), 1761-1768.
  • Vaheddoost, B., Aksoy, H., Abghari, H., & Naghadeh, S. (2015). Decision tree for measuring the interaction of hyper-saline lake and coastal aquifer in Lake Urmia. In Proceeding of Environmental and Water Resource Institute (EWRI): Watershed Management Symposium, August (pp. 5-7).
  • Yu, Z., Haghighat, F., Fung, B. C., & Yoshino, H. (2010). A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1637-1646.

Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree

Year 2020, Volume: 33 Issue: 1, 62 - 72, 01.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463

Abstract

Several recent studies have used various data mining techniques to obtain accurate electrical energy demand forecasts in power supply systems. This paper, for the first time, compares the efficiency of the decision tree (DT) and classic genetic programming (GP) data mining models developed for electrical energy demand forecasting in Nicosia, Northern Cyprus. The models were trained and tested using daily electricity consumptions measured during the period 2011-2016 and were compared in terms of three statistical performance indices including coefficient of determination, mean absolute percentage error and concordance coefficient. The prediction results showed that the proposed models can be effectively applied to forecasts of electrical energy demand. The results also indicated that the GP is slightly superior to DT in terms of the performance indices.

References

  • Aghaei, J., & Alizadeh, M. I. (2013). Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 64-72.
  • Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F., & Sohrabkhani, S. (2008). Annual electricity consumption forecasting by neural network in high energy consuming industrial sectors. Energy Conversion and management, 49(8), 2272-2278.
  • Bakhshaii, A., & Stull, R. (2012). Electric load forecasting for western Canada: A comparison of two non-linear methods. Atmosphere-Ocean, 50(3), 352-363.
  • Balk, B., & Elder, K. (2000). Combining binary decision tree and geostatistical methods to estimate snow distribution in a mountain watershed. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 13-26.
  • Bhattacharya, M., Abraham, A., & Nath, B. (2002). A linear genetic programming approach for modelling electricity demand prediction in Victoria. In Hybrid Information Systems, 379-393. Physica, Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany Springer-Verlag.
  • Breiman, L., J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1984.
  • Çunkaş, M., & Taşkiran, U. (2011). Turkey's electricity consumption forecasting using genetic programming. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(4), 406-416.
  • Danandeh Mehr A., Bagheri, F., & Reşatoğlu, R. (2018a) “A genetic programming approach to forecast daily electricity demand. 13th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing. Warsaw, Poland, 27–28 August.
  • Danandeh Mehr, A., Nourani, V., Kahya, E., Hrnjica, B., Sattar, A. M., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2018b). Genetic programming in water resources engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Hydrology 566, 643-667.
  • Danandeh Mehr, A., Nourani, V., Hrnjica, B., & Molajou, A. (2017). A binary genetic programing model for teleconnection identification between global sea surface temperature and local maximum monthly rainfall events. Journal of Hydrology, 555, 397-406.
  • Ekonomou, L. (2010). Greek long-term energy consumption prediction using artificial neural networks. Energy, 35(2), 512-517.
  • Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier.
  • Hrnjica, B., & Danandeh Mehr, A. (2019). Optimized Genetic Programming Applications: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey, PA, USA, IGI-Global.
  • Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C. K., & Ranka, S. (2000). Elements of artificial neural networks. 2nd ed. Massachusetts, USA, MIT press.
  • Mousavi, S. M., Mostafavi, E. S., & Hosseinpour, F. (2014). Gene expression programming as a basis for new generation of electricity demand prediction models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 120-128.
  • Mwasilu, F., Justo, J. J., Kim, E. K., Do, T. D., & Jung, J. W. (2014). Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: A review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 34, 501-516.
  • Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
  • Safari, M. J. S. (2019). DT, GR and MARS models for sediment transport in sewer pipes. Water Science and Technology https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.106.
  • Tso, G. K., & Yau, K. K. (2007). Predicting electricity energy consumption: A comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks. Energy, 32(9), 1761-1768.
  • Vaheddoost, B., Aksoy, H., Abghari, H., & Naghadeh, S. (2015). Decision tree for measuring the interaction of hyper-saline lake and coastal aquifer in Lake Urmia. In Proceeding of Environmental and Water Resource Institute (EWRI): Watershed Management Symposium, August (pp. 5-7).
  • Yu, Z., Haghighat, F., Fung, B. C., & Yoshino, H. (2010). A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1637-1646.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Electrical & Electronics Engineering
Authors

Ali Danandeh Mehr 0000-0003-2769-106X

Farzaneh Bagheri This is me 0000-0002-7335-0277

Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari 0000-0003-0559-5261

Publication Date March 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 33 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Danandeh Mehr, A., Bagheri, F., & Safari, M. J. S. (2020). Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science, 33(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463
AMA Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS. Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science. March 2020;33(1):62-72. doi:10.35378/gujs.554463
Chicago Danandeh Mehr, Ali, Farzaneh Bagheri, and Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari. “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”. Gazi University Journal of Science 33, no. 1 (March 2020): 62-72. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463.
EndNote Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS (March 1, 2020) Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science 33 1 62–72.
IEEE A. Danandeh Mehr, F. Bagheri, and M. J. S. Safari, “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 62–72, 2020, doi: 10.35378/gujs.554463.
ISNAD Danandeh Mehr, Ali et al. “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”. Gazi University Journal of Science 33/1 (March 2020), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463.
JAMA Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS. Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2020;33:62–72.
MLA Danandeh Mehr, Ali et al. “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 33, no. 1, 2020, pp. 62-72, doi:10.35378/gujs.554463.
Vancouver Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS. Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2020;33(1):62-7.