Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2017, Volume: 27 Issue: 3, 124 - 129, 03.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.381280

Abstract



Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı kalınlıklarda ve farklı
yapıdaki tam seramik materyallerinin translusenstlik değerlerini incelemektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Beş farklı seramikten (feldspatik, lösit ile
güçlendirilmiş, lityumdisilikat ile güçlendirilmiş,
altyapı zirkonya,
monolitik zirkonya
) ve iki farklı kalınlıkta (0,5-1 mm) örnekler
hazırlanmıştır. Her bir grup için örnek sayısı beş olarak saptanmıştır.
Örneklerin kontrastlık oranlarını elde etmek için elde etmek için
spektrofotometreyle beyaz zemin (L*w) ve siyah
zemin (L*b) üzerinde üçer adet ölçüm gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler iki yönlü
varyans analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Gruplar arası
karşılaştırmalar için Tukey’s HSD testi kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: 0,5 mm kalınlıktaki gruplar kendi aralarında
karşılaştırıldığında feldspatik ve lösit ile güçlendirilmiş cam seramik dışında
bütün gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı
farklılıklar görülmüştür.
1 mm kalınlığındaki gruplar kendi aralarında
karşılaştırıldığında altyapı zirkonya ve monolitik zirkonya dışında bütün
gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur.

Sonuç: Kalınlık ve yapısal farklılıklar seramiğin translusensi
özelliğini etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Tam seramik,  translusensi, kontrastlık
oranı

COMPARISON OF TRANSLUCENCY VALUES OF
ALL CERAMIC MATERIALS WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURES AND THICKNESSES

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of the study
is to evaluate the translucency of all ceramic materials with different
thicknesses and structures.

Material and Methods: Specimens
with two different thicknesses (0.5-1 mm) were prepared from five different
ceramic materials (feldspathic, leucite-reinforced, lithium disilicate
reinforced, framework zirconia, monolithic zirconia). Each group contained five
specimens. Three measurements were made with spectrophotometry to obtain the
contrast ratios of the materials over a white background (L*w) and a black
background (L*b). The data was analysed by two-way analysis of variance. The
groups were compared by Tukey’s HSD test.

Results: Groups which have a
thickness of 0.5 mm had statistically significant differences except feldspatic
and leucite reinforced ceramic. Groups which have a thickness of 1 mm had
statistically significant differences except framework zirconia and monolithic
zirconia.



Conclusion: Thickness
and structural differences affects the translucency feature of ceramic.

Keywords: All ceramic, translucency,
contrast ratio

References

  • 1. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32:3-12.
  • 2. Dietschi D. Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:71-80.
  • 3. Ulu H, Bayındır F. Monolitik zirkonyum restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016; Supp 15: 67-72.
  • 4. Clarke FJ. Measurement of color of human teeth. In: McLean JW, editor. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1983. p. 441-90.
  • 5. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64.
  • 6. Kramer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater. 2006;22:13-21.
  • 7. De Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF, Lopes GC. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):358-68.
  • 8. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconiumoxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:237-44.
  • 9. Della Bona A. Bonding to ceramics: scientific evidences for clinical dentistry. Sao Paulo: Artes Medicas; 2009: 252.
  • 10. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Fundamentals of materials science. In: Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM, editors. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012. p. 33–81
  • 11. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32. 12. JA, Miller RB. The effect of core translucency on the aesthetics of all-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:567-74.
  • 13. Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to ceramics. 2nd ed. New York; John Wiley and Sons; 1976, p. 646- 89.
  • 14. Berns RS. Principles of color technology. 3rd ed. New York; John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2000, p. 8-9.
  • 15. Mclean JW. New dental ceramics and esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:141-9.
  • 16. Zhang HB, Kim BN, Morita K, Yoshida H, Lim JH, Hiraga K. Optimization of high-pressure sintering of transparent zirconia with nano-sized grains. J Alloy Compd 2010;508: 196-9.
  • 17. Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials. Dental Materials 2009;25:158–65.
  • 18. Bagis B, Turgut S. Optical properties of current ceramics systems for laminate veneers. Journal of Dentistry 2013;41:24–30.
  • 19. Barizon KTL, Bergeron C, Vargas MA, Qian F, Cobb DS, Gratton DG, et al. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers. Part I: Correlation between translucency parameters and contrast ratio. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:397–401.
  • 20. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  • 21. Holloway JA, Miller RB. The effect of core translucency on the aesthetics of all-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:567-74.
  • 22. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
  • 23. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  • 24. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  • 25. Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2008,24:1506-11.
  • 26. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:14-20.
  • 27. Zirkonzahn web sitesi. http://www.zirkonzahn. com/en/prettau-zirconia/prettau-zirconia. Erişim: 24-09-2016.
  • 28. Tuncel İ, Turp I, Üşümez A. Evaluation of translucency of monolithic zirconia and framework zirconia materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:181-6.
  • 29. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, Cardona Jde L, Paravina RD, Pérez Mdel M. Color and translucency of zirconia ceramics, human dentine and bovine dentine. J Dent 2012;40:e34-40.
  • 30. Ding Y, Jiang S, Luo T, Miura Y, Peyghambarian N. Lithium disilicate crystalline slab waveguides from surface crystallised glass. Electronics Letters 1999;35:504-5.
  • 31. Kursoglu P, Karagoz Motro PF, Kazazoglu E. Translucency of ceramic material in different core-veneer combinations. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:48-53.
Year 2017, Volume: 27 Issue: 3, 124 - 129, 03.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.381280

Abstract

References

  • 1. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32:3-12.
  • 2. Dietschi D. Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:71-80.
  • 3. Ulu H, Bayındır F. Monolitik zirkonyum restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016; Supp 15: 67-72.
  • 4. Clarke FJ. Measurement of color of human teeth. In: McLean JW, editor. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1983. p. 441-90.
  • 5. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64.
  • 6. Kramer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater. 2006;22:13-21.
  • 7. De Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF, Lopes GC. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):358-68.
  • 8. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconiumoxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:237-44.
  • 9. Della Bona A. Bonding to ceramics: scientific evidences for clinical dentistry. Sao Paulo: Artes Medicas; 2009: 252.
  • 10. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Fundamentals of materials science. In: Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM, editors. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012. p. 33–81
  • 11. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32. 12. JA, Miller RB. The effect of core translucency on the aesthetics of all-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:567-74.
  • 13. Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to ceramics. 2nd ed. New York; John Wiley and Sons; 1976, p. 646- 89.
  • 14. Berns RS. Principles of color technology. 3rd ed. New York; John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2000, p. 8-9.
  • 15. Mclean JW. New dental ceramics and esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:141-9.
  • 16. Zhang HB, Kim BN, Morita K, Yoshida H, Lim JH, Hiraga K. Optimization of high-pressure sintering of transparent zirconia with nano-sized grains. J Alloy Compd 2010;508: 196-9.
  • 17. Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials. Dental Materials 2009;25:158–65.
  • 18. Bagis B, Turgut S. Optical properties of current ceramics systems for laminate veneers. Journal of Dentistry 2013;41:24–30.
  • 19. Barizon KTL, Bergeron C, Vargas MA, Qian F, Cobb DS, Gratton DG, et al. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers. Part I: Correlation between translucency parameters and contrast ratio. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:397–401.
  • 20. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  • 21. Holloway JA, Miller RB. The effect of core translucency on the aesthetics of all-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:567-74.
  • 22. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
  • 23. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  • 24. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  • 25. Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2008,24:1506-11.
  • 26. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:14-20.
  • 27. Zirkonzahn web sitesi. http://www.zirkonzahn. com/en/prettau-zirconia/prettau-zirconia. Erişim: 24-09-2016.
  • 28. Tuncel İ, Turp I, Üşümez A. Evaluation of translucency of monolithic zirconia and framework zirconia materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:181-6.
  • 29. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, Cardona Jde L, Paravina RD, Pérez Mdel M. Color and translucency of zirconia ceramics, human dentine and bovine dentine. J Dent 2012;40:e34-40.
  • 30. Ding Y, Jiang S, Luo T, Miura Y, Peyghambarian N. Lithium disilicate crystalline slab waveguides from surface crystallised glass. Electronics Letters 1999;35:504-5.
  • 31. Kursoglu P, Karagoz Motro PF, Kazazoglu E. Translucency of ceramic material in different core-veneer combinations. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:48-53.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Articles
Authors

İlkin Tuncel

İşıl Turp This is me

Publication Date December 3, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 27 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Tuncel, İ., & Turp, İ. (2017). FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(3), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.381280
AMA Tuncel İ, Turp İ. FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. December 2017;27(3):124-129. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.381280
Chicago Tuncel, İlkin, and İşıl Turp. “FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 27, no. 3 (December 2017): 124-29. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.381280.
EndNote Tuncel İ, Turp İ (December 1, 2017) FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 27 3 124–129.
IEEE İ. Tuncel and İ. Turp, “FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 124–129, 2017, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.381280.
ISNAD Tuncel, İlkin - Turp, İşıl. “FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 27/3 (December 2017), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.381280.
JAMA Tuncel İ, Turp İ. FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2017;27:124–129.
MLA Tuncel, İlkin and İşıl Turp. “FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 27, no. 3, 2017, pp. 124-9, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.381280.
Vancouver Tuncel İ, Turp İ. FARKLI İÇERİK VE KALINLIKTAKİ TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARIN TRANSLUSENTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2017;27(3):124-9.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.